TY - JOUR
T1 - Who monitors the monitor? Effect of party observers on electoral outcomes
AU - Casas, Agustín
AU - Díaz, Guillermo
AU - Trindade, André
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - We investigate whether electoral monitors, who are in charge of assuring the fairness of elections, interfere with their outcome. More precisely, does the monitors' presence bias the results in favor of their own preferences? To do so, we construct a novel dataset from the raw voting records of the 2011 national elections in Argentina. We exploit a natural experiment to show that electoral observers cause, on average, a 1.5% increase in the vote count for the observers' preferred party, which can reach up to 6% for some parties. This bias, which appears under various electoral rules, occurs mainly in municipalities with lower civic capital and weakens the accountability role of elections.
AB - We investigate whether electoral monitors, who are in charge of assuring the fairness of elections, interfere with their outcome. More precisely, does the monitors' presence bias the results in favor of their own preferences? To do so, we construct a novel dataset from the raw voting records of the 2011 national elections in Argentina. We exploit a natural experiment to show that electoral observers cause, on average, a 1.5% increase in the vote count for the observers' preferred party, which can reach up to 6% for some parties. This bias, which appears under various electoral rules, occurs mainly in municipalities with lower civic capital and weakens the accountability role of elections.
KW - Accountability
KW - Electoral fraud
KW - Quasi natural experiment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000392974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.015
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85000392974
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 145
SP - 136
EP - 149
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
ER -