TY - JOUR
T1 - The properties of merging black holes and neutron stars across cosmic time
AU - Mapelli, Michela
AU - Giacobbo, Nicola
AU - Santoliquido, Filippo
AU - Artale, Maria Celeste
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/7/21
Y1 - 2019/7/21
N2 - The next generation ground-based gravitational wave interferometers will possibly observe mergers of binary black holes (BBHs) and binary neutron stars (BNSs) to redshift z ≥ 10 and ≥ 2, respectively. Here, we characterize the properties of merging BBHs, BNSs, and neutron star-black hole binaries across cosmic time, by means of population-synthesis simulations combined with the ILLUSTRIS cosmological simulation. We find that the mass of merging compact objects does not depend (or depends very mildly) on the merger redshift. Even the mass distribution of black holes (BHs) depends only mildly on redshift, because BBHs originating from metal-poor progenitors (Z ≤ 4 × 10-3) dominate the entire population of merging BBHs across cosmic time. For a common-envelope efficiency α ≥ 3, the main difference between the mass distribution of BBHs merging in the last Gyr and that of BBHs merging more than 11 Gyr ago is that there is an excess of heavy merging BHs (20-35 M⊙) in the last Gyr. This excess is explained by the longer delay time of massive BBHs.
AB - The next generation ground-based gravitational wave interferometers will possibly observe mergers of binary black holes (BBHs) and binary neutron stars (BNSs) to redshift z ≥ 10 and ≥ 2, respectively. Here, we characterize the properties of merging BBHs, BNSs, and neutron star-black hole binaries across cosmic time, by means of population-synthesis simulations combined with the ILLUSTRIS cosmological simulation. We find that the mass of merging compact objects does not depend (or depends very mildly) on the merger redshift. Even the mass distribution of black holes (BHs) depends only mildly on redshift, because BBHs originating from metal-poor progenitors (Z ≤ 4 × 10-3) dominate the entire population of merging BBHs across cosmic time. For a common-envelope efficiency α ≥ 3, the main difference between the mass distribution of BBHs merging in the last Gyr and that of BBHs merging more than 11 Gyr ago is that there is an excess of heavy merging BHs (20-35 M⊙) in the last Gyr. This excess is explained by the longer delay time of massive BBHs.
KW - Black hole physics
KW - Gravitational waves
KW - Methods: numerical
KW - Stars: Massloss
KW - Stars: neutron
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069957216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/mnras/stz1150
DO - 10.1093/mnras/stz1150
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85069957216
SN - 0035-8711
VL - 487
SP - 2
EP - 13
JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
IS - 1
ER -