The international investment regime and local populations: Are the weakest voices unheard?

Nicolás M. Perrone

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo

4 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The laws that govern the allocation and use of resources can not only annihilate individual property rights but also destroy community. Locals’ participation in decisions about property is therefore vital. This article argues that local populations currently have a limited voice in foreign investment decisions, and that the international investment regime contributes to this unfair result. The interpretation of investment tribunals, according to international investment treaties, relies on reasoning that promotes the calculability of investments and the trust of foreign investors above all. Often, this interpretation threatens other property rights and community values. This article illustrates these dangers using the cases of Aguas del Tunari v Bolivia and Chevron v Ecuador. It concludes by suggesting that international law can be part of a solution to these problems; but for that, we need to give local populations a meaningful role in foreign investment governance.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)383-405
Número de páginas23
PublicaciónTransnational Legal Theory
Volumen7
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 ene 2016
Publicado de forma externa

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

  • Derecho

Huella Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'The international investment regime and local populations: Are the weakest voices unheard?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

  • Citar esto