The evaluation of nursing graduates' scientific reasoning and oral and written communication

Ingrid Demandes, Cecilia A. Latrach, Naldy Pamela Febre, Claudia Muñoz, Pamela Torres, Jessica Retamal

Resultado de la investigación: Article

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

This descriptive, cross-sectional study was performed in Santiago de Chile, with the objective to evaluate the scientific reasoning and the oral and written communication of nursing graduates. The sample consisted of 37 nursing graduates who participated in the three stages of the study: I) creation and validation of the instrument; II) training the faculty participating in the study to apply the instrument uniformly; and III) application of the instrument and data analysis. The data show different percentages regarding this competency, with the predominance of scientific reasoning (83.16%), followed by oral and written communication (78.37%). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the value for nursing schools to implement a formal evaluation that allows for determining the profile of nursing graduates, guaranteeing the quality of their training and education.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)980-984
Número de páginas5
PublicaciónRevista da Escola de Enfermagem
Volumen46
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublished - ago 2012

Huella dactilar

Nursing
Communication
Nursing Schools
Chile
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Citar esto

Demandes, Ingrid ; Latrach, Cecilia A. ; Febre, Naldy Pamela ; Muñoz, Claudia ; Torres, Pamela ; Retamal, Jessica. / The evaluation of nursing graduates' scientific reasoning and oral and written communication. En: Revista da Escola de Enfermagem. 2012 ; Vol. 46, N.º 4. pp. 980-984.
@article{6a8b02abc401468b9f3de9d51d414a87,
title = "The evaluation of nursing graduates' scientific reasoning and oral and written communication",
abstract = "This descriptive, cross-sectional study was performed in Santiago de Chile, with the objective to evaluate the scientific reasoning and the oral and written communication of nursing graduates. The sample consisted of 37 nursing graduates who participated in the three stages of the study: I) creation and validation of the instrument; II) training the faculty participating in the study to apply the instrument uniformly; and III) application of the instrument and data analysis. The data show different percentages regarding this competency, with the predominance of scientific reasoning (83.16{\%}), followed by oral and written communication (78.37{\%}). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the value for nursing schools to implement a formal evaluation that allows for determining the profile of nursing graduates, guaranteeing the quality of their training and education.",
keywords = "Communication, Education, Nursing, Students",
author = "Ingrid Demandes and Latrach, {Cecilia A.} and Febre, {Naldy Pamela} and Claudia Mu{\~n}oz and Pamela Torres and Jessica Retamal",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1590/S0080-62342012000400028",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "980--984",
journal = "Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P.",
issn = "0080-6234",
publisher = "University of Sao Paolo",
number = "4",

}

The evaluation of nursing graduates' scientific reasoning and oral and written communication. / Demandes, Ingrid; Latrach, Cecilia A.; Febre, Naldy Pamela; Muñoz, Claudia; Torres, Pamela; Retamal, Jessica.

En: Revista da Escola de Enfermagem, Vol. 46, N.º 4, 08.2012, p. 980-984.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The evaluation of nursing graduates' scientific reasoning and oral and written communication

AU - Demandes, Ingrid

AU - Latrach, Cecilia A.

AU - Febre, Naldy Pamela

AU - Muñoz, Claudia

AU - Torres, Pamela

AU - Retamal, Jessica

PY - 2012/8

Y1 - 2012/8

N2 - This descriptive, cross-sectional study was performed in Santiago de Chile, with the objective to evaluate the scientific reasoning and the oral and written communication of nursing graduates. The sample consisted of 37 nursing graduates who participated in the three stages of the study: I) creation and validation of the instrument; II) training the faculty participating in the study to apply the instrument uniformly; and III) application of the instrument and data analysis. The data show different percentages regarding this competency, with the predominance of scientific reasoning (83.16%), followed by oral and written communication (78.37%). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the value for nursing schools to implement a formal evaluation that allows for determining the profile of nursing graduates, guaranteeing the quality of their training and education.

AB - This descriptive, cross-sectional study was performed in Santiago de Chile, with the objective to evaluate the scientific reasoning and the oral and written communication of nursing graduates. The sample consisted of 37 nursing graduates who participated in the three stages of the study: I) creation and validation of the instrument; II) training the faculty participating in the study to apply the instrument uniformly; and III) application of the instrument and data analysis. The data show different percentages regarding this competency, with the predominance of scientific reasoning (83.16%), followed by oral and written communication (78.37%). In conclusion, this study demonstrates the value for nursing schools to implement a formal evaluation that allows for determining the profile of nursing graduates, guaranteeing the quality of their training and education.

KW - Communication

KW - Education

KW - Nursing

KW - Students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867599454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1590/S0080-62342012000400028

DO - 10.1590/S0080-62342012000400028

M3 - Article

C2 - 23018411

AN - SCOPUS:84867599454

VL - 46

SP - 980

EP - 984

JO - Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P.

JF - Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P.

SN - 0080-6234

IS - 4

ER -