TY - JOUR
T1 - The addition of blood flow restriction to resistance exercise in individuals with knee pain
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Cuyul-Vásquez, Iván
AU - Leiva-Sepúlveda, Alejandro
AU - Catalán-Medalla, Oscar
AU - Araya-Quintanilla, Felipe
AU - Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Hector
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Blood flow restriction (BFR) is an effective clinical intervention used to increase strength in healthy individuals. However, its effects on pain and function in individuals with knee pain are unknown. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of adding BFR to resistance exercise for pain relief and improvement of function improvement in patients with knee pain. Methods: design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Data sources: Medline, Central, Embase, PEDro, Lilacs, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to May 2019. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomized clinical trials that compared resistance exercise with or without BFR to treat knee pain and function in individuals older than 18 years of age with knee pain. Results: Eight randomized clinical trials met the eligibility criteria and for the quantitative synthesis, five studies were included. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) estimate showed that resistance exercises with BFR was not more effective than resistance exercises for reducing pain (SMD: −0.37 cm, 95% CI = −0.93, 0.19) and improving knee function (SMD = −0.23 points, 95% CI = −0.71, 0.26) in patients with knee pain. Conclusion: In the short term, there is low quality of evidence that resistance exercise with BFR does not provide significant differences in pain relief and knee function compared to resistance exercises in patients with knee pain. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018102839.
AB - Background: Blood flow restriction (BFR) is an effective clinical intervention used to increase strength in healthy individuals. However, its effects on pain and function in individuals with knee pain are unknown. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of adding BFR to resistance exercise for pain relief and improvement of function improvement in patients with knee pain. Methods: design: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Data sources: Medline, Central, Embase, PEDro, Lilacs, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to May 2019. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomized clinical trials that compared resistance exercise with or without BFR to treat knee pain and function in individuals older than 18 years of age with knee pain. Results: Eight randomized clinical trials met the eligibility criteria and for the quantitative synthesis, five studies were included. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) estimate showed that resistance exercises with BFR was not more effective than resistance exercises for reducing pain (SMD: −0.37 cm, 95% CI = −0.93, 0.19) and improving knee function (SMD = −0.23 points, 95% CI = −0.71, 0.26) in patients with knee pain. Conclusion: In the short term, there is low quality of evidence that resistance exercise with BFR does not provide significant differences in pain relief and knee function compared to resistance exercises in patients with knee pain. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018102839.
KW - Anterior knee pain
KW - Blood flow restriction
KW - Knee
KW - Osteoarthritis
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081735700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.03.001
DO - 10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.03.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32198025
AN - SCOPUS:85081735700
SN - 1413-3555
JO - Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
JF - Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
ER -