Systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments to measure sexual desire

Denisse Cartagena-Ramos, Miguel Fuentealba-Torres, Flávio Rebustini, Ana Carolina Andrade Biaggi Leite, Willyane De Andrade Alvarenga, Ricardo Alexandre Arcêncio, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti Dantas, Lucila Castanheira Nascimento

Resultado de la investigación: Review article

Resumen

Background: Sexual desire is one of the domains of sexual function with multiple dimensions, which commonly affects men and women around the world. Classically, its assessment has been applied through self-report tools; however, an issue is related to the evidence level of these questionnaires and their validity. Therefore, a systematic review addressing the available questionnaires is really relevant, since it will be able to show their psychometric properties and evidence levels. Method: A systematic review was carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases. The search strategy was developed according to the following research question and combination of descriptors and keywords, including original studies with no limit of publication date and in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Two reviewers carried out the selection of articles by abstracts and full texts as well as the analysis of the studies independently. The methodological quality of the instruments was evaluated by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results: The search resulted in 1203 articles, of which 15 were included in the review. It identified 10 instruments originally developed in the English language. Unsatisfactory results on methodological quality were evidenced in cultural adaptation studies with no description of the steps of the processes and inadequacy of techniques and parameters of adequacy for models. The Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation predominated in the studies. Conclusions: The limitation of the techniques applied in the validation process of the reviewed instruments was evident. A limitation was observed in the number of adaptations conducted and contexts to which the instruments were applied, making it impossible to reach a better understanding of the functioning of instruments. In future studies, the use of robust techniques can ensure the quality of the psychometric properties and the accuracy and stability of instruments. A detailed description of procedures and results in validation studies may facilitate the selection and use of instruments in the academic and/or clinical settings. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018085706.

Idioma originalEnglish
Número de artículo109
PublicaciónBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volumen18
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublished - 19 oct 2018
Publicado de forma externa

Huella dactilar

Psychometrics
Validation Studies
Principal Component Analysis
Checklist
PubMed
Self Report
Health Status
Publications
Consensus
Language
Databases
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Informatics

Citar esto

Cartagena-Ramos, D., Fuentealba-Torres, M., Rebustini, F., Leite, A. C. A. B., Alvarenga, W. D. A., Arcêncio, R. A., ... Nascimento, L. C. (2018). Systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments to measure sexual desire. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), [109]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0570-2
Cartagena-Ramos, Denisse ; Fuentealba-Torres, Miguel ; Rebustini, Flávio ; Leite, Ana Carolina Andrade Biaggi ; Alvarenga, Willyane De Andrade ; Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre ; Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti ; Nascimento, Lucila Castanheira. / Systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments to measure sexual desire. En: BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018 ; Vol. 18, N.º 1.
@article{14f6fe866b914c0ba706091dd58fb242,
title = "Systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments to measure sexual desire",
abstract = "Background: Sexual desire is one of the domains of sexual function with multiple dimensions, which commonly affects men and women around the world. Classically, its assessment has been applied through self-report tools; however, an issue is related to the evidence level of these questionnaires and their validity. Therefore, a systematic review addressing the available questionnaires is really relevant, since it will be able to show their psychometric properties and evidence levels. Method: A systematic review was carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases. The search strategy was developed according to the following research question and combination of descriptors and keywords, including original studies with no limit of publication date and in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Two reviewers carried out the selection of articles by abstracts and full texts as well as the analysis of the studies independently. The methodological quality of the instruments was evaluated by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results: The search resulted in 1203 articles, of which 15 were included in the review. It identified 10 instruments originally developed in the English language. Unsatisfactory results on methodological quality were evidenced in cultural adaptation studies with no description of the steps of the processes and inadequacy of techniques and parameters of adequacy for models. The Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation predominated in the studies. Conclusions: The limitation of the techniques applied in the validation process of the reviewed instruments was evident. A limitation was observed in the number of adaptations conducted and contexts to which the instruments were applied, making it impossible to reach a better understanding of the functioning of instruments. In future studies, the use of robust techniques can ensure the quality of the psychometric properties and the accuracy and stability of instruments. A detailed description of procedures and results in validation studies may facilitate the selection and use of instruments in the academic and/or clinical settings. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018085706.",
keywords = "Cross-cultural comparison, Libido, Psychometric, Reliability, Reproducibility of results, Sexual desire, Validity",
author = "Denisse Cartagena-Ramos and Miguel Fuentealba-Torres and Fl{\'a}vio Rebustini and Leite, {Ana Carolina Andrade Biaggi} and Alvarenga, {Willyane De Andrade} and Arc{\^e}ncio, {Ricardo Alexandre} and Dantas, {Rosana Aparecida Spadoti} and Nascimento, {Lucila Castanheira}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1186/s12874-018-0570-2",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Medical Research Methodology",
issn = "1471-2288",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Cartagena-Ramos, D, Fuentealba-Torres, M, Rebustini, F, Leite, ACAB, Alvarenga, WDA, Arcêncio, RA, Dantas, RAS & Nascimento, LC 2018, 'Systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments to measure sexual desire', BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 18, n.º 1, 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0570-2

Systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments to measure sexual desire. / Cartagena-Ramos, Denisse; Fuentealba-Torres, Miguel; Rebustini, Flávio; Leite, Ana Carolina Andrade Biaggi; Alvarenga, Willyane De Andrade; Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre; Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti; Nascimento, Lucila Castanheira.

En: BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 18, N.º 1, 109, 19.10.2018.

Resultado de la investigación: Review article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments to measure sexual desire

AU - Cartagena-Ramos, Denisse

AU - Fuentealba-Torres, Miguel

AU - Rebustini, Flávio

AU - Leite, Ana Carolina Andrade Biaggi

AU - Alvarenga, Willyane De Andrade

AU - Arcêncio, Ricardo Alexandre

AU - Dantas, Rosana Aparecida Spadoti

AU - Nascimento, Lucila Castanheira

PY - 2018/10/19

Y1 - 2018/10/19

N2 - Background: Sexual desire is one of the domains of sexual function with multiple dimensions, which commonly affects men and women around the world. Classically, its assessment has been applied through self-report tools; however, an issue is related to the evidence level of these questionnaires and their validity. Therefore, a systematic review addressing the available questionnaires is really relevant, since it will be able to show their psychometric properties and evidence levels. Method: A systematic review was carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases. The search strategy was developed according to the following research question and combination of descriptors and keywords, including original studies with no limit of publication date and in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Two reviewers carried out the selection of articles by abstracts and full texts as well as the analysis of the studies independently. The methodological quality of the instruments was evaluated by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results: The search resulted in 1203 articles, of which 15 were included in the review. It identified 10 instruments originally developed in the English language. Unsatisfactory results on methodological quality were evidenced in cultural adaptation studies with no description of the steps of the processes and inadequacy of techniques and parameters of adequacy for models. The Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation predominated in the studies. Conclusions: The limitation of the techniques applied in the validation process of the reviewed instruments was evident. A limitation was observed in the number of adaptations conducted and contexts to which the instruments were applied, making it impossible to reach a better understanding of the functioning of instruments. In future studies, the use of robust techniques can ensure the quality of the psychometric properties and the accuracy and stability of instruments. A detailed description of procedures and results in validation studies may facilitate the selection and use of instruments in the academic and/or clinical settings. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018085706.

AB - Background: Sexual desire is one of the domains of sexual function with multiple dimensions, which commonly affects men and women around the world. Classically, its assessment has been applied through self-report tools; however, an issue is related to the evidence level of these questionnaires and their validity. Therefore, a systematic review addressing the available questionnaires is really relevant, since it will be able to show their psychometric properties and evidence levels. Method: A systematic review was carried out in the PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases. The search strategy was developed according to the following research question and combination of descriptors and keywords, including original studies with no limit of publication date and in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Two reviewers carried out the selection of articles by abstracts and full texts as well as the analysis of the studies independently. The methodological quality of the instruments was evaluated by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Results: The search resulted in 1203 articles, of which 15 were included in the review. It identified 10 instruments originally developed in the English language. Unsatisfactory results on methodological quality were evidenced in cultural adaptation studies with no description of the steps of the processes and inadequacy of techniques and parameters of adequacy for models. The Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation predominated in the studies. Conclusions: The limitation of the techniques applied in the validation process of the reviewed instruments was evident. A limitation was observed in the number of adaptations conducted and contexts to which the instruments were applied, making it impossible to reach a better understanding of the functioning of instruments. In future studies, the use of robust techniques can ensure the quality of the psychometric properties and the accuracy and stability of instruments. A detailed description of procedures and results in validation studies may facilitate the selection and use of instruments in the academic and/or clinical settings. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018085706.

KW - Cross-cultural comparison

KW - Libido

KW - Psychometric

KW - Reliability

KW - Reproducibility of results

KW - Sexual desire

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055078098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12874-018-0570-2

DO - 10.1186/s12874-018-0570-2

M3 - Review article

C2 - 30340533

AN - SCOPUS:85055078098

VL - 18

JO - BMC Medical Research Methodology

JF - BMC Medical Research Methodology

SN - 1471-2288

IS - 1

M1 - 109

ER -