Resumen
In the first part of the article (§ 1-6), the author deals with the debate about the limits of criminal liability for negligent medical malpractice in a global con-text characterized by the standardization of clinical practices. The critical considera-tion of the recent legal reforms in Italy, as well as the prevalent models defended by criminal law scholars, allows the configuration of a paradigm of imputation capable of combining the interests of patients with those of health professionals. In the last part (§ 7-8), the author considers how the same "balanced" -liberal as well as solida-ristic- criterion could allow regulating medical liability for adopting indications pro-vided by Artificial Intelligence systems. The conclusions (§ 9) emphasise how stan-dardisation and automation processes find an insurmountable obstacle in the de-fence of pluralism, autonomy and the ethics of responsibility.
Título traducido de la contribución | Standardization, automation, and medical malpractice: From recent reforms to a soli-daristic and liberal imputation model |
---|---|
Idioma original | Italiano |
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 207-235 |
Número de páginas | 29 |
Publicación | BioLaw Journal |
Volumen | 2019 |
N.º | 1 |
Estado | Publicada - 1 ene. 2019 |
Palabras clave
- Artificial intelligence
- Autonomy
- Criminal negligence
- Medical malpractice
- Standardisation
Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus
- Biotecnología
- Medicina (miscelánea)
- Bioquímica, genética y biología molecular (miscelánea)
- Filosofía
- Políticas sanitarias
- Derecho