Sistematización de una experiencia piloto de implementación de una sala gesell para la entrevista de niños en un tribunal de familia

Juan Carlos Oyanedel S., Harry Ortúzar F.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

Resumen

Introduction: Children and adolescents who are victims of sexual abuse or severe mistreatment are exposed to secondary victimization –understood as the revictimization resulting from the constant memory of the mistreatment or the abuse suffered when they are subject of multiple questions about what happened– when they have contact with the justice system. In 2012, the Chilean State implemented a pilot Gesell dome in order to reduce this risk and move towards a single interview process, with probative value in the context of the judicial process. Objective: To systematize the implementation process of a Gessel Dome in a chilean Family Court. Subjects and Method: Qualitative, non-experimental, exploratory and descriptive study. Ten representatives of institutions of the inter-institutional network of the Family Court at the city of Melipilla were interviewed. Purposive sampling was used for the selection of participants, which seeks to obtain a representative discourse of the participants. The Semi-structured Individual Interview was used, based on seven research dimensions: 1) knowledge of the Gesell dome; 2) knowledge of the right of the child to be heard; 3) knowledge regarding severe mistreatment and sexual abuse; 4) knowledge about secondary victimization; 5) organization and operation of the institutional network; 6) training; and 7) general evaluation of the Gesell dome of the Melipilla Family Court. Results: There are differences in knowledge and information management among the institutions associated with the project. Coordination difficulties of the local network that affect the objectives of the project are identified. Conclusions: There are problems of coordination and networking in the implementation and use of the Gesell dome. In order to achieve the objective of reducing secondary victimization, in addition to the investment in physical facilities and specialized training, a strong investment in local network management and coordination is required. The results facilitate the development of plans to avoid such difficulties in the future implementation of Gesell domes as public policy.

Idioma originalSpanish
Páginas (desde-hasta)694-700
Número de páginas7
PublicaciónRevista Chilena de Pediatria
Volumen89
N.º6
DOI
EstadoPublished - 1 nov 2018

Huella dactilar

Crime Victims
Sex Offenses
Interviews
Knowledge Management
Information Management
Social Justice
Public Policy
Organizations
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Citar esto

@article{95f9f9b9ebf14772964ee3d6d9ff40fb,
title = "Sistematizaci{\'o}n de una experiencia piloto de implementaci{\'o}n de una sala gesell para la entrevista de ni{\~n}os en un tribunal de familia",
abstract = "Introduction: Children and adolescents who are victims of sexual abuse or severe mistreatment are exposed to secondary victimization –understood as the revictimization resulting from the constant memory of the mistreatment or the abuse suffered when they are subject of multiple questions about what happened– when they have contact with the justice system. In 2012, the Chilean State implemented a pilot Gesell dome in order to reduce this risk and move towards a single interview process, with probative value in the context of the judicial process. Objective: To systematize the implementation process of a Gessel Dome in a chilean Family Court. Subjects and Method: Qualitative, non-experimental, exploratory and descriptive study. Ten representatives of institutions of the inter-institutional network of the Family Court at the city of Melipilla were interviewed. Purposive sampling was used for the selection of participants, which seeks to obtain a representative discourse of the participants. The Semi-structured Individual Interview was used, based on seven research dimensions: 1) knowledge of the Gesell dome; 2) knowledge of the right of the child to be heard; 3) knowledge regarding severe mistreatment and sexual abuse; 4) knowledge about secondary victimization; 5) organization and operation of the institutional network; 6) training; and 7) general evaluation of the Gesell dome of the Melipilla Family Court. Results: There are differences in knowledge and information management among the institutions associated with the project. Coordination difficulties of the local network that affect the objectives of the project are identified. Conclusions: There are problems of coordination and networking in the implementation and use of the Gesell dome. In order to achieve the objective of reducing secondary victimization, in addition to the investment in physical facilities and specialized training, a strong investment in local network management and coordination is required. The results facilitate the development of plans to avoid such difficulties in the future implementation of Gesell domes as public policy.",
keywords = "Chile, Family court, Institutional networks, Secondary victimization",
author = "{Oyanedel S.}, {Juan Carlos} and {Ort{\'u}zar F.}, Harry",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4067/S0370-41062018005000813",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "89",
pages = "694--700",
journal = "Revista Chilena de Pediatria",
issn = "0370-4106",
publisher = "Sociedad Chilena de Pediatria",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sistematización de una experiencia piloto de implementación de una sala gesell para la entrevista de niños en un tribunal de familia

AU - Oyanedel S., Juan Carlos

AU - Ortúzar F., Harry

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Introduction: Children and adolescents who are victims of sexual abuse or severe mistreatment are exposed to secondary victimization –understood as the revictimization resulting from the constant memory of the mistreatment or the abuse suffered when they are subject of multiple questions about what happened– when they have contact with the justice system. In 2012, the Chilean State implemented a pilot Gesell dome in order to reduce this risk and move towards a single interview process, with probative value in the context of the judicial process. Objective: To systematize the implementation process of a Gessel Dome in a chilean Family Court. Subjects and Method: Qualitative, non-experimental, exploratory and descriptive study. Ten representatives of institutions of the inter-institutional network of the Family Court at the city of Melipilla were interviewed. Purposive sampling was used for the selection of participants, which seeks to obtain a representative discourse of the participants. The Semi-structured Individual Interview was used, based on seven research dimensions: 1) knowledge of the Gesell dome; 2) knowledge of the right of the child to be heard; 3) knowledge regarding severe mistreatment and sexual abuse; 4) knowledge about secondary victimization; 5) organization and operation of the institutional network; 6) training; and 7) general evaluation of the Gesell dome of the Melipilla Family Court. Results: There are differences in knowledge and information management among the institutions associated with the project. Coordination difficulties of the local network that affect the objectives of the project are identified. Conclusions: There are problems of coordination and networking in the implementation and use of the Gesell dome. In order to achieve the objective of reducing secondary victimization, in addition to the investment in physical facilities and specialized training, a strong investment in local network management and coordination is required. The results facilitate the development of plans to avoid such difficulties in the future implementation of Gesell domes as public policy.

AB - Introduction: Children and adolescents who are victims of sexual abuse or severe mistreatment are exposed to secondary victimization –understood as the revictimization resulting from the constant memory of the mistreatment or the abuse suffered when they are subject of multiple questions about what happened– when they have contact with the justice system. In 2012, the Chilean State implemented a pilot Gesell dome in order to reduce this risk and move towards a single interview process, with probative value in the context of the judicial process. Objective: To systematize the implementation process of a Gessel Dome in a chilean Family Court. Subjects and Method: Qualitative, non-experimental, exploratory and descriptive study. Ten representatives of institutions of the inter-institutional network of the Family Court at the city of Melipilla were interviewed. Purposive sampling was used for the selection of participants, which seeks to obtain a representative discourse of the participants. The Semi-structured Individual Interview was used, based on seven research dimensions: 1) knowledge of the Gesell dome; 2) knowledge of the right of the child to be heard; 3) knowledge regarding severe mistreatment and sexual abuse; 4) knowledge about secondary victimization; 5) organization and operation of the institutional network; 6) training; and 7) general evaluation of the Gesell dome of the Melipilla Family Court. Results: There are differences in knowledge and information management among the institutions associated with the project. Coordination difficulties of the local network that affect the objectives of the project are identified. Conclusions: There are problems of coordination and networking in the implementation and use of the Gesell dome. In order to achieve the objective of reducing secondary victimization, in addition to the investment in physical facilities and specialized training, a strong investment in local network management and coordination is required. The results facilitate the development of plans to avoid such difficulties in the future implementation of Gesell domes as public policy.

KW - Chile

KW - Family court

KW - Institutional networks

KW - Secondary victimization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060038601&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4067/S0370-41062018005000813

DO - 10.4067/S0370-41062018005000813

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060038601

VL - 89

SP - 694

EP - 700

JO - Revista Chilena de Pediatria

JF - Revista Chilena de Pediatria

SN - 0370-4106

IS - 6

ER -