Nivel de evidencia de los artículos publicados en la Revista Chilena de Cirugía. Evaluación del período 2007-2012

Javier Moraga C., Ricardo Cartes-Velásquez, Sebastián Urrutia V., Carlos Manterola D.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

3 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Aim: To determine the level of evidence (LE) of articles published in Revista Chilena Cirugía (RCC) in the period 2007-2012 and their association with year of publication, subject area and university affiliation (UA). Material and Methods: Bibliometric study. An analysis of articles published between 2007 and 2012 in the RCC, applying the classification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) was performed. The sample is composed of all articles published in the period under study, which was feasible to apply the CEBM classification. The variables analyzed were LE, research design, year of publication, subject area and UA dichotomized (Yes/No). The LE of the items was determined by three independent investigators and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We performed an exploratory analysis of the data and the results are presented using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 688 articles published in the period, 452 meet the selection criteria. The most frequent LE was 4 and 2b (91.4% and 5.8% respectively). The most frequent research designs were case report and retrospective case series (45.6% and 32.3% respectively). The subject areas that most articles provided were liver, biliary tract and pancreas; and esophagus, stomach, duodenum and small intestine (18.6% and 18.1% respectively). The 76.5% of the articles presented UA. These had a higher proportion of articles with LE greater than 4 respect of those without UA (9.5% vs 5.6% respectively). Conclusion: A signifcant proportion of articles published in RCC during the study period are of low LE.

Idioma originalSpanish
Páginas (desde-hasta)301-306
Número de páginas6
PublicaciónRevista Chilena de Cirugia
Volumen65
N.º4
EstadoPublished - 4 sep 2013

Huella dactilar

Publications
Research Design
Bibliometrics
Evidence-Based Medicine
Biliary Tract
Duodenum
Patient Selection
Esophagus
Small Intestine
Pancreas
Stomach
Research Personnel
Liver

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Citar esto

Moraga C., J., Cartes-Velásquez, R., Urrutia V., S., & Manterola D., C. (2013). Nivel de evidencia de los artículos publicados en la Revista Chilena de Cirugía. Evaluación del período 2007-2012. Revista Chilena de Cirugia, 65(4), 301-306.
Moraga C., Javier ; Cartes-Velásquez, Ricardo ; Urrutia V., Sebastián ; Manterola D., Carlos. / Nivel de evidencia de los artículos publicados en la Revista Chilena de Cirugía. Evaluación del período 2007-2012. En: Revista Chilena de Cirugia. 2013 ; Vol. 65, N.º 4. pp. 301-306.
@article{26ea3e9a435b4cbbb3774efa3b40bb33,
title = "Nivel de evidencia de los art{\'i}culos publicados en la Revista Chilena de Cirug{\'i}a. Evaluaci{\'o}n del per{\'i}odo 2007-2012",
abstract = "Aim: To determine the level of evidence (LE) of articles published in Revista Chilena Cirug{\'i}a (RCC) in the period 2007-2012 and their association with year of publication, subject area and university affiliation (UA). Material and Methods: Bibliometric study. An analysis of articles published between 2007 and 2012 in the RCC, applying the classification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) was performed. The sample is composed of all articles published in the period under study, which was feasible to apply the CEBM classification. The variables analyzed were LE, research design, year of publication, subject area and UA dichotomized (Yes/No). The LE of the items was determined by three independent investigators and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We performed an exploratory analysis of the data and the results are presented using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 688 articles published in the period, 452 meet the selection criteria. The most frequent LE was 4 and 2b (91.4{\%} and 5.8{\%} respectively). The most frequent research designs were case report and retrospective case series (45.6{\%} and 32.3{\%} respectively). The subject areas that most articles provided were liver, biliary tract and pancreas; and esophagus, stomach, duodenum and small intestine (18.6{\%} and 18.1{\%} respectively). The 76.5{\%} of the articles presented UA. These had a higher proportion of articles with LE greater than 4 respect of those without UA (9.5{\%} vs 5.6{\%} respectively). Conclusion: A signifcant proportion of articles published in RCC during the study period are of low LE.",
keywords = "{"}Bibliometrics{"} [MeSH], {"}Evidence-based medicine{"} [Mesh], {"}Surgical procedures, Evidence levels, Operative{"} [MeSH]",
author = "{Moraga C.}, Javier and Ricardo Cartes-Vel{\'a}squez and {Urrutia V.}, Sebasti{\'a}n and {Manterola D.}, Carlos",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "4",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "65",
pages = "301--306",
journal = "Revista Chilena de Cirugia",
issn = "0379-3893",
publisher = "Sociedad De Cirujanos De Chile",
number = "4",

}

Moraga C., J, Cartes-Velásquez, R, Urrutia V., S & Manterola D., C 2013, 'Nivel de evidencia de los artículos publicados en la Revista Chilena de Cirugía. Evaluación del período 2007-2012', Revista Chilena de Cirugia, vol. 65, n.º 4, pp. 301-306.

Nivel de evidencia de los artículos publicados en la Revista Chilena de Cirugía. Evaluación del período 2007-2012. / Moraga C., Javier; Cartes-Velásquez, Ricardo; Urrutia V., Sebastián; Manterola D., Carlos.

En: Revista Chilena de Cirugia, Vol. 65, N.º 4, 04.09.2013, p. 301-306.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nivel de evidencia de los artículos publicados en la Revista Chilena de Cirugía. Evaluación del período 2007-2012

AU - Moraga C., Javier

AU - Cartes-Velásquez, Ricardo

AU - Urrutia V., Sebastián

AU - Manterola D., Carlos

PY - 2013/9/4

Y1 - 2013/9/4

N2 - Aim: To determine the level of evidence (LE) of articles published in Revista Chilena Cirugía (RCC) in the period 2007-2012 and their association with year of publication, subject area and university affiliation (UA). Material and Methods: Bibliometric study. An analysis of articles published between 2007 and 2012 in the RCC, applying the classification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) was performed. The sample is composed of all articles published in the period under study, which was feasible to apply the CEBM classification. The variables analyzed were LE, research design, year of publication, subject area and UA dichotomized (Yes/No). The LE of the items was determined by three independent investigators and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We performed an exploratory analysis of the data and the results are presented using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 688 articles published in the period, 452 meet the selection criteria. The most frequent LE was 4 and 2b (91.4% and 5.8% respectively). The most frequent research designs were case report and retrospective case series (45.6% and 32.3% respectively). The subject areas that most articles provided were liver, biliary tract and pancreas; and esophagus, stomach, duodenum and small intestine (18.6% and 18.1% respectively). The 76.5% of the articles presented UA. These had a higher proportion of articles with LE greater than 4 respect of those without UA (9.5% vs 5.6% respectively). Conclusion: A signifcant proportion of articles published in RCC during the study period are of low LE.

AB - Aim: To determine the level of evidence (LE) of articles published in Revista Chilena Cirugía (RCC) in the period 2007-2012 and their association with year of publication, subject area and university affiliation (UA). Material and Methods: Bibliometric study. An analysis of articles published between 2007 and 2012 in the RCC, applying the classification of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) was performed. The sample is composed of all articles published in the period under study, which was feasible to apply the CEBM classification. The variables analyzed were LE, research design, year of publication, subject area and UA dichotomized (Yes/No). The LE of the items was determined by three independent investigators and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. We performed an exploratory analysis of the data and the results are presented using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 688 articles published in the period, 452 meet the selection criteria. The most frequent LE was 4 and 2b (91.4% and 5.8% respectively). The most frequent research designs were case report and retrospective case series (45.6% and 32.3% respectively). The subject areas that most articles provided were liver, biliary tract and pancreas; and esophagus, stomach, duodenum and small intestine (18.6% and 18.1% respectively). The 76.5% of the articles presented UA. These had a higher proportion of articles with LE greater than 4 respect of those without UA (9.5% vs 5.6% respectively). Conclusion: A signifcant proportion of articles published in RCC during the study period are of low LE.

KW - "Bibliometrics" [MeSH]

KW - "Evidence-based medicine" [Mesh]

KW - "Surgical procedures

KW - Evidence levels

KW - Operative" [MeSH]

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883244377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84883244377

VL - 65

SP - 301

EP - 306

JO - Revista Chilena de Cirugia

JF - Revista Chilena de Cirugia

SN - 0379-3893

IS - 4

ER -