“Ni ahora ni nunca”

diatriba y pensamiento positivo en Contra los hijos, de Lina Meruane

Resultado de la investigación: Article

Resumen

Through the idea of ‘positive thinking’ and its presence in the discourses of late capitalism, this article tries to demarcate a theoretical field from which to read texts like Contra los hijos (2018), by Lina Meruane, accentuating the tension between positivity and negativity. Far from offering a rhetorical reading, this paper revisits the origins of the modern diatribe to propose a reading in which diatribes cannot be understood outside a post-dictatorial context, in this case, marked by economic discourses around happiness and their willingness to hide or minimize social criticism. This approach allows us to understand how the politics of diatribe are articulated with a double critical potential: on the one hand, they point to an established target (the obligatory condition of motherhood, in this case) and, on the other, they question certain inflections of the discourses of late capitalism adopted by the Chilean transition that aim, in particular, to avoid and silence most of critical exercises.

Idioma originalSpanish
PublicaciónNeophilologus
DOI
EstadoPublished - 1 ene 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Citar esto

@article{479f8a22009c4996a271a7fdbe2e3a2c,
title = "“Ni ahora ni nunca”: diatriba y pensamiento positivo en Contra los hijos, de Lina Meruane",
abstract = "Through the idea of ‘positive thinking’ and its presence in the discourses of late capitalism, this article tries to demarcate a theoretical field from which to read texts like Contra los hijos (2018), by Lina Meruane, accentuating the tension between positivity and negativity. Far from offering a rhetorical reading, this paper revisits the origins of the modern diatribe to propose a reading in which diatribes cannot be understood outside a post-dictatorial context, in this case, marked by economic discourses around happiness and their willingness to hide or minimize social criticism. This approach allows us to understand how the politics of diatribe are articulated with a double critical potential: on the one hand, they point to an established target (the obligatory condition of motherhood, in this case) and, on the other, they question certain inflections of the discourses of late capitalism adopted by the Chilean transition that aim, in particular, to avoid and silence most of critical exercises.",
keywords = "Contemporary Chilean literature, Diatribe, Irony, Lina Meruane, Positive thinking",
author = "Gonzalo Maier",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11061-019-09615-8",
language = "Spanish",
journal = "Neophilologus",
issn = "0028-2677",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Ni ahora ni nunca”

T2 - diatriba y pensamiento positivo en Contra los hijos, de Lina Meruane

AU - Maier, Gonzalo

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Through the idea of ‘positive thinking’ and its presence in the discourses of late capitalism, this article tries to demarcate a theoretical field from which to read texts like Contra los hijos (2018), by Lina Meruane, accentuating the tension between positivity and negativity. Far from offering a rhetorical reading, this paper revisits the origins of the modern diatribe to propose a reading in which diatribes cannot be understood outside a post-dictatorial context, in this case, marked by economic discourses around happiness and their willingness to hide or minimize social criticism. This approach allows us to understand how the politics of diatribe are articulated with a double critical potential: on the one hand, they point to an established target (the obligatory condition of motherhood, in this case) and, on the other, they question certain inflections of the discourses of late capitalism adopted by the Chilean transition that aim, in particular, to avoid and silence most of critical exercises.

AB - Through the idea of ‘positive thinking’ and its presence in the discourses of late capitalism, this article tries to demarcate a theoretical field from which to read texts like Contra los hijos (2018), by Lina Meruane, accentuating the tension between positivity and negativity. Far from offering a rhetorical reading, this paper revisits the origins of the modern diatribe to propose a reading in which diatribes cannot be understood outside a post-dictatorial context, in this case, marked by economic discourses around happiness and their willingness to hide or minimize social criticism. This approach allows us to understand how the politics of diatribe are articulated with a double critical potential: on the one hand, they point to an established target (the obligatory condition of motherhood, in this case) and, on the other, they question certain inflections of the discourses of late capitalism adopted by the Chilean transition that aim, in particular, to avoid and silence most of critical exercises.

KW - Contemporary Chilean literature

KW - Diatribe

KW - Irony

KW - Lina Meruane

KW - Positive thinking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068766839&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11061-019-09615-8

DO - 10.1007/s11061-019-09615-8

M3 - Article

JO - Neophilologus

JF - Neophilologus

SN - 0028-2677

ER -