Making sense of heat tolerance estimates in ectotherms: Lessons from Drosophila

Mauro Santos, Luis E. Castañeda, Enrico L. Rezende

Resultado de la investigación: Article

61 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

1.An increasing body of knowledge suggests that the estimation of critical upper thermal limits (CTmax) is highly dependent on the experimental methodology employed. Here, we employ a theoretical approach to analyse how estimates of CTmax (knock-down temperatures and times) are affected by measurement protocol. 2.Our model is able to reproduce the results of empirical studies on Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting that it adequately mimics organismal responses during assays. With simulated data sets, we also show that many experimental protocols result in unreliable and often highly biased estimates of CTmax in Drosophila and possibly in other ectotherms. 3.The confounding effects of stochasticity, resource depletion (or fatigue) and short-term acclimatory responses are expected to be higher in longer assays, and therefore, short assays should be generally preferred. The experimental protocol of choice must also take into consideration the range in which measurement accuracy is not affected and the potential problems of thermal inertia in larger organisms. 4.Our findings justify previous concerns that the methodology may have a greater impact on estimates of CTmax than the biological process under study, and explain why many studies on the subject have often reported inconsistent and even contradictory results.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)1169-1180
Número de páginas12
PublicaciónFunctional Ecology
Volumen25
N.º6
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic 2011

Huella dactilar

heat tolerance
Drosophila
tolerance
assay
assays
heat
resource depletion
methodology
stochasticity
fatigue
inertia
biological processes
Drosophila melanogaster
organisms
protocol
temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citar esto

Santos, Mauro ; Castañeda, Luis E. ; Rezende, Enrico L. / Making sense of heat tolerance estimates in ectotherms : Lessons from Drosophila. En: Functional Ecology. 2011 ; Vol. 25, N.º 6. pp. 1169-1180.
@article{0100168b105e49ad958ab173ee1b75b6,
title = "Making sense of heat tolerance estimates in ectotherms: Lessons from Drosophila",
abstract = "1.An increasing body of knowledge suggests that the estimation of critical upper thermal limits (CTmax) is highly dependent on the experimental methodology employed. Here, we employ a theoretical approach to analyse how estimates of CTmax (knock-down temperatures and times) are affected by measurement protocol. 2.Our model is able to reproduce the results of empirical studies on Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting that it adequately mimics organismal responses during assays. With simulated data sets, we also show that many experimental protocols result in unreliable and often highly biased estimates of CTmax in Drosophila and possibly in other ectotherms. 3.The confounding effects of stochasticity, resource depletion (or fatigue) and short-term acclimatory responses are expected to be higher in longer assays, and therefore, short assays should be generally preferred. The experimental protocol of choice must also take into consideration the range in which measurement accuracy is not affected and the potential problems of thermal inertia in larger organisms. 4.Our findings justify previous concerns that the methodology may have a greater impact on estimates of CTmax than the biological process under study, and explain why many studies on the subject have often reported inconsistent and even contradictory results.",
keywords = "Critical thermal limits, CT, Genetic correlation, Gompertz equation, Repeatability, Survival probability, Thermotolerance",
author = "Mauro Santos and Casta{\~n}eda, {Luis E.} and Rezende, {Enrico L.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01908.x",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1169--1180",
journal = "Functional Ecology",
issn = "0269-8463",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Making sense of heat tolerance estimates in ectotherms : Lessons from Drosophila. / Santos, Mauro; Castañeda, Luis E.; Rezende, Enrico L.

En: Functional Ecology, Vol. 25, N.º 6, 12.2011, p. 1169-1180.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making sense of heat tolerance estimates in ectotherms

T2 - Lessons from Drosophila

AU - Santos, Mauro

AU - Castañeda, Luis E.

AU - Rezende, Enrico L.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - 1.An increasing body of knowledge suggests that the estimation of critical upper thermal limits (CTmax) is highly dependent on the experimental methodology employed. Here, we employ a theoretical approach to analyse how estimates of CTmax (knock-down temperatures and times) are affected by measurement protocol. 2.Our model is able to reproduce the results of empirical studies on Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting that it adequately mimics organismal responses during assays. With simulated data sets, we also show that many experimental protocols result in unreliable and often highly biased estimates of CTmax in Drosophila and possibly in other ectotherms. 3.The confounding effects of stochasticity, resource depletion (or fatigue) and short-term acclimatory responses are expected to be higher in longer assays, and therefore, short assays should be generally preferred. The experimental protocol of choice must also take into consideration the range in which measurement accuracy is not affected and the potential problems of thermal inertia in larger organisms. 4.Our findings justify previous concerns that the methodology may have a greater impact on estimates of CTmax than the biological process under study, and explain why many studies on the subject have often reported inconsistent and even contradictory results.

AB - 1.An increasing body of knowledge suggests that the estimation of critical upper thermal limits (CTmax) is highly dependent on the experimental methodology employed. Here, we employ a theoretical approach to analyse how estimates of CTmax (knock-down temperatures and times) are affected by measurement protocol. 2.Our model is able to reproduce the results of empirical studies on Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting that it adequately mimics organismal responses during assays. With simulated data sets, we also show that many experimental protocols result in unreliable and often highly biased estimates of CTmax in Drosophila and possibly in other ectotherms. 3.The confounding effects of stochasticity, resource depletion (or fatigue) and short-term acclimatory responses are expected to be higher in longer assays, and therefore, short assays should be generally preferred. The experimental protocol of choice must also take into consideration the range in which measurement accuracy is not affected and the potential problems of thermal inertia in larger organisms. 4.Our findings justify previous concerns that the methodology may have a greater impact on estimates of CTmax than the biological process under study, and explain why many studies on the subject have often reported inconsistent and even contradictory results.

KW - Critical thermal limits

KW - CT

KW - Genetic correlation

KW - Gompertz equation

KW - Repeatability

KW - Survival probability

KW - Thermotolerance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80855139853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01908.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01908.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:80855139853

VL - 25

SP - 1169

EP - 1180

JO - Functional Ecology

JF - Functional Ecology

SN - 0269-8463

IS - 6

ER -