Resumen
The study criticizes the understanding of the burden of proof in our judicial system and discusses controversial applications of the burden of proof as a judgment rule in relation to compliance or civil non-compliance, in the field of contractual medical liability and in the specific area of the so-called exceptio non adimpleti contractus of synalagmatic contracts. The analysis will focus on the specific procedural problems of burden of proof on the subject of alternative proof of compliance-civil breach, from an approach that will take into account normative and jurisprudential issues in Chilean law, and the possibilities offered by a treatment of those from the perspective of systematic criteria developed by procedural dogmatics.
Título traducido de la contribución | THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN RELATION TO CIVIL COMPLIANCE-NON-COMPLIANCE AS THEMA PROBANDUM IN MEDICAL LIABILITY AND EXCEPTIO NON ADIMPLETI CONTRACTUS |
---|---|
Idioma original | Español |
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 155-179 |
Número de páginas | 25 |
Publicación | Revista Chilena de Derecho |
Volumen | 48 |
N.º | 3 |
DOI | |
Estado | Publicada - 1 dic. 2021 |
Palabras clave
- breach of contract
- burden of proof
- exceptio non adimpleti contractus
Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus
- Derecho