International law as an extralegal defense strategy in West Germany's stammheim terror trial

Resultado de la investigación: Article

Resumen

The trial of the core members of the terrorist group the Red Army Faction (RAF) provided the backdrop to what was the final crescendo of the most tumultuous period in West German history. The trial began in May 1975, with the verdict in Spring 1977 giving way to the "German Autumn," a violent few months that climaxed with a kidnapping, a hijacking and the prison deaths of the RAF leaders. The defense strategy for the trial was to frustrate the process and ignore the charges in favor of using the proceedings to present the RAF cause and RAF identity. This article outlines how the extralegal use of the high-profile case as a platform to communicate with an audience beyond the courtroom was grounded in an instrumentalization of international legal conventions on "political prisoners" and "prisoners of war" as hooks for the RAF's rhetoric of anti-fascism and anti-imperialism.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)375-394
Número de páginas20
PublicaciónLaw, Culture and the Humanities
Volumen9
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2013

Huella dactilar

Red Army
faction
international law
terrorism
RAF
anti-imperialism
political prisoner
prisoner of war
instrumentalization
fascism
correctional institution
rhetoric
leader
death
cause
Factions
West Germany
International Law
Terror
history

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cultural Studies
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Citar esto

@article{2f851b4e74d4478192d2d0dfc166724e,
title = "International law as an extralegal defense strategy in West Germany's stammheim terror trial",
abstract = "The trial of the core members of the terrorist group the Red Army Faction (RAF) provided the backdrop to what was the final crescendo of the most tumultuous period in West German history. The trial began in May 1975, with the verdict in Spring 1977 giving way to the {"}German Autumn,{"} a violent few months that climaxed with a kidnapping, a hijacking and the prison deaths of the RAF leaders. The defense strategy for the trial was to frustrate the process and ignore the charges in favor of using the proceedings to present the RAF cause and RAF identity. This article outlines how the extralegal use of the high-profile case as a platform to communicate with an audience beyond the courtroom was grounded in an instrumentalization of international legal conventions on {"}political prisoners{"} and {"}prisoners of war{"} as hooks for the RAF's rhetoric of anti-fascism and anti-imperialism.",
keywords = "Cause lawyering, European commission of human rights, Geneva conventions, Political prisoners, Political trial, Prisoners of war, Red army faction, Stammheim",
author = "Leith Passmore",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/1743872111416326",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "375--394",
journal = "Law, Culture and the Humanities",
issn = "1743-8721",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International law as an extralegal defense strategy in West Germany's stammheim terror trial

AU - Passmore, Leith

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The trial of the core members of the terrorist group the Red Army Faction (RAF) provided the backdrop to what was the final crescendo of the most tumultuous period in West German history. The trial began in May 1975, with the verdict in Spring 1977 giving way to the "German Autumn," a violent few months that climaxed with a kidnapping, a hijacking and the prison deaths of the RAF leaders. The defense strategy for the trial was to frustrate the process and ignore the charges in favor of using the proceedings to present the RAF cause and RAF identity. This article outlines how the extralegal use of the high-profile case as a platform to communicate with an audience beyond the courtroom was grounded in an instrumentalization of international legal conventions on "political prisoners" and "prisoners of war" as hooks for the RAF's rhetoric of anti-fascism and anti-imperialism.

AB - The trial of the core members of the terrorist group the Red Army Faction (RAF) provided the backdrop to what was the final crescendo of the most tumultuous period in West German history. The trial began in May 1975, with the verdict in Spring 1977 giving way to the "German Autumn," a violent few months that climaxed with a kidnapping, a hijacking and the prison deaths of the RAF leaders. The defense strategy for the trial was to frustrate the process and ignore the charges in favor of using the proceedings to present the RAF cause and RAF identity. This article outlines how the extralegal use of the high-profile case as a platform to communicate with an audience beyond the courtroom was grounded in an instrumentalization of international legal conventions on "political prisoners" and "prisoners of war" as hooks for the RAF's rhetoric of anti-fascism and anti-imperialism.

KW - Cause lawyering

KW - European commission of human rights

KW - Geneva conventions

KW - Political prisoners

KW - Political trial

KW - Prisoners of war

KW - Red army faction

KW - Stammheim

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878381182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1743872111416326

DO - 10.1177/1743872111416326

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 375

EP - 394

JO - Law, Culture and the Humanities

JF - Law, Culture and the Humanities

SN - 1743-8721

IS - 2

ER -