Insertion torque and resonance Frequency analysis (ISQ) as predictor methods of implant osseointegration

O. Gahona, X. Granic, C. Antunez, S. Domancic, V. Díaz-Narváez, R. Utsman

Resultado de la investigación: Article

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Aim Determining appropriate primary stability at time of implant placement is a key therapeutic decision. The aim of the study was to compare insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ) obtained at the time of implant placement, as predictors of osseointegration. Methods There were 31 implants evaluated in the maxilla and 29 in the mandible. A "High Torque Indicating Ratchet Wrench" was used for the measurement of insertion torque and a "Osstell MentorR" to register the ISQ value at the end of each surgery. At 6 weeks counter-torque was performed on each implant using a "Low Torque Indicating Ratchet Wrench" applying 20 to 32 Ncm. Successful osseointegration was appropriately obtained with torque insertion of 35 or more and an ISQ of 60 or more without mobility, as well as torque insertion less than 35 and an ISQ less than 60 with mobility. The results, contrary to those described above, were considered to be failure. The use of ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves establishes differences between the two methods. Contingency tables and Kappa statistics were used to analyze the coincidence results between methods. Insertion torque was used as the Gold Standard. The significance level used is α≤0.05. Results In the ROC curve analysis, the area of value was 0.611 (p> 0.05). The Kappa statistic value was 0.208 (p> 0.05) and there are no discrepancies between success and failure between the two methods compared. Conclusion Both methods tend to have the same results in relation to the studied variables.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)103-107
Número de páginas5
PublicaciónJournal of Osseointegration
Volumen10
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublished - 27 jul 2018

Huella dactilar

Osseointegration
Torque
ROC Curve
Maxilla
Mandible

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Citar esto

Gahona, O. ; Granic, X. ; Antunez, C. ; Domancic, S. ; Díaz-Narváez, V. ; Utsman, R. / Insertion torque and resonance Frequency analysis (ISQ) as predictor methods of implant osseointegration. En: Journal of Osseointegration. 2018 ; Vol. 10, N.º 3. pp. 103-107.
@article{29d731c1f88a4792883113c47ed18362,
title = "Insertion torque and resonance Frequency analysis (ISQ) as predictor methods of implant osseointegration",
abstract = "Aim Determining appropriate primary stability at time of implant placement is a key therapeutic decision. The aim of the study was to compare insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ) obtained at the time of implant placement, as predictors of osseointegration. Methods There were 31 implants evaluated in the maxilla and 29 in the mandible. A {"}High Torque Indicating Ratchet Wrench{"} was used for the measurement of insertion torque and a {"}Osstell MentorR{"} to register the ISQ value at the end of each surgery. At 6 weeks counter-torque was performed on each implant using a {"}Low Torque Indicating Ratchet Wrench{"} applying 20 to 32 Ncm. Successful osseointegration was appropriately obtained with torque insertion of 35 or more and an ISQ of 60 or more without mobility, as well as torque insertion less than 35 and an ISQ less than 60 with mobility. The results, contrary to those described above, were considered to be failure. The use of ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves establishes differences between the two methods. Contingency tables and Kappa statistics were used to analyze the coincidence results between methods. Insertion torque was used as the Gold Standard. The significance level used is α≤0.05. Results In the ROC curve analysis, the area of value was 0.611 (p> 0.05). The Kappa statistic value was 0.208 (p> 0.05) and there are no discrepancies between success and failure between the two methods compared. Conclusion Both methods tend to have the same results in relation to the studied variables.",
keywords = "Dental implants, Insertion torque, Primary stability, Resonance frequency analysis",
author = "O. Gahona and X. Granic and C. Antunez and S. Domancic and V. D{\'i}az-Narv{\'a}ez and R. Utsman",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "27",
doi = "10.23805/JO.2018.10.03.06",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "103--107",
journal = "Journal of Osseointegration",
issn = "2036-413X",
publisher = "Ariesdue srl",
number = "3",

}

Insertion torque and resonance Frequency analysis (ISQ) as predictor methods of implant osseointegration. / Gahona, O.; Granic, X.; Antunez, C.; Domancic, S.; Díaz-Narváez, V.; Utsman, R.

En: Journal of Osseointegration, Vol. 10, N.º 3, 27.07.2018, p. 103-107.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insertion torque and resonance Frequency analysis (ISQ) as predictor methods of implant osseointegration

AU - Gahona, O.

AU - Granic, X.

AU - Antunez, C.

AU - Domancic, S.

AU - Díaz-Narváez, V.

AU - Utsman, R.

PY - 2018/7/27

Y1 - 2018/7/27

N2 - Aim Determining appropriate primary stability at time of implant placement is a key therapeutic decision. The aim of the study was to compare insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ) obtained at the time of implant placement, as predictors of osseointegration. Methods There were 31 implants evaluated in the maxilla and 29 in the mandible. A "High Torque Indicating Ratchet Wrench" was used for the measurement of insertion torque and a "Osstell MentorR" to register the ISQ value at the end of each surgery. At 6 weeks counter-torque was performed on each implant using a "Low Torque Indicating Ratchet Wrench" applying 20 to 32 Ncm. Successful osseointegration was appropriately obtained with torque insertion of 35 or more and an ISQ of 60 or more without mobility, as well as torque insertion less than 35 and an ISQ less than 60 with mobility. The results, contrary to those described above, were considered to be failure. The use of ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves establishes differences between the two methods. Contingency tables and Kappa statistics were used to analyze the coincidence results between methods. Insertion torque was used as the Gold Standard. The significance level used is α≤0.05. Results In the ROC curve analysis, the area of value was 0.611 (p> 0.05). The Kappa statistic value was 0.208 (p> 0.05) and there are no discrepancies between success and failure between the two methods compared. Conclusion Both methods tend to have the same results in relation to the studied variables.

AB - Aim Determining appropriate primary stability at time of implant placement is a key therapeutic decision. The aim of the study was to compare insertion torque and implant stability quotient (ISQ) obtained at the time of implant placement, as predictors of osseointegration. Methods There were 31 implants evaluated in the maxilla and 29 in the mandible. A "High Torque Indicating Ratchet Wrench" was used for the measurement of insertion torque and a "Osstell MentorR" to register the ISQ value at the end of each surgery. At 6 weeks counter-torque was performed on each implant using a "Low Torque Indicating Ratchet Wrench" applying 20 to 32 Ncm. Successful osseointegration was appropriately obtained with torque insertion of 35 or more and an ISQ of 60 or more without mobility, as well as torque insertion less than 35 and an ISQ less than 60 with mobility. The results, contrary to those described above, were considered to be failure. The use of ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves establishes differences between the two methods. Contingency tables and Kappa statistics were used to analyze the coincidence results between methods. Insertion torque was used as the Gold Standard. The significance level used is α≤0.05. Results In the ROC curve analysis, the area of value was 0.611 (p> 0.05). The Kappa statistic value was 0.208 (p> 0.05) and there are no discrepancies between success and failure between the two methods compared. Conclusion Both methods tend to have the same results in relation to the studied variables.

KW - Dental implants

KW - Insertion torque

KW - Primary stability

KW - Resonance frequency analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050996136&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.23805/JO.2018.10.03.06

DO - 10.23805/JO.2018.10.03.06

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 103

EP - 107

JO - Journal of Osseointegration

JF - Journal of Osseointegration

SN - 2036-413X

IS - 3

ER -