TY - JOUR
T1 - High-speed resistance training is more effective than low-speed resistance training to increase functional capacity and muscle performance in older women
AU - Ramírez-Campillo, Rodrigo
AU - Castillo, Angélica
AU - de la Fuente, Carlos I.
AU - Campos-Jara, Christian
AU - Andrade, David C.
AU - Álvarez, Cristian
AU - Martínez, Cristian
AU - Castro-Sepúlveda, Mauricio
AU - Pereira, Ana
AU - Marques, Mário C.
AU - Izquierdo, Mikel
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Objective: To examine the effects of 12weeks of high-speed resistance training (RT) versus low-speed RT on muscle strength [one repetition of maximum leg-press (1RMLP) and bench-press (1RMBP), plus dominant (HGd) and non-dominant maximum isometric handgrip], power [counter-movement jump (CMJ), ball throwing (BT) and 10-m walking sprint (S10)], functional performance [8-foot up-and-go test (UG) and sit-to-stand test (STS)], and perceived quality of life in older women. Methods: 45 older women were divided into a high-speed RT group [EG, n. = 15, age. = 66.3. ±. 3.7. y], a low-speed RT group [SG, n. = 15, age. = 68.7. ±. 6.4. y] and a control group [CG, n. = 15, age. = 66.7. ±. 4.9. y]. The SG and EG were submitted to a similar 12-week RT program [3 sets of 8 reps at 40-75% of the one-repetition maximum (1. <. RM), CMJ and BT] using slow, controlled (3. s) concentric muscle actions for the SG and using fast, explosive (<. 1. s) concentric muscle actions for the EG (20% less work per exercise without CMJ and BT). Results: Over the 12-week training period, both RT groups showed small to large clinically significant improvements in the dependent variables; however, a significant difference was found between the EG and SG for the performance changes in BT, S10 and UG (20% vs. 11%, p. <. 0.05; 14% vs. 9%, p. <. 0.05; 18% vs. 10%, p. <. 0.01; respectively). No significant changes were observed for the CG. Conclusion: Both RT interventions are effective in improving functional capacity, muscle performance and quality of life in older women, although a high-speed RT program induces greater improvements in muscle power and functional capacity.
AB - Objective: To examine the effects of 12weeks of high-speed resistance training (RT) versus low-speed RT on muscle strength [one repetition of maximum leg-press (1RMLP) and bench-press (1RMBP), plus dominant (HGd) and non-dominant maximum isometric handgrip], power [counter-movement jump (CMJ), ball throwing (BT) and 10-m walking sprint (S10)], functional performance [8-foot up-and-go test (UG) and sit-to-stand test (STS)], and perceived quality of life in older women. Methods: 45 older women were divided into a high-speed RT group [EG, n. = 15, age. = 66.3. ±. 3.7. y], a low-speed RT group [SG, n. = 15, age. = 68.7. ±. 6.4. y] and a control group [CG, n. = 15, age. = 66.7. ±. 4.9. y]. The SG and EG were submitted to a similar 12-week RT program [3 sets of 8 reps at 40-75% of the one-repetition maximum (1. <. RM), CMJ and BT] using slow, controlled (3. s) concentric muscle actions for the SG and using fast, explosive (<. 1. s) concentric muscle actions for the EG (20% less work per exercise without CMJ and BT). Results: Over the 12-week training period, both RT groups showed small to large clinically significant improvements in the dependent variables; however, a significant difference was found between the EG and SG for the performance changes in BT, S10 and UG (20% vs. 11%, p. <. 0.05; 14% vs. 9%, p. <. 0.05; 18% vs. 10%, p. <. 0.01; respectively). No significant changes were observed for the CG. Conclusion: Both RT interventions are effective in improving functional capacity, muscle performance and quality of life in older women, although a high-speed RT program induces greater improvements in muscle power and functional capacity.
KW - Adaptation
KW - Aging
KW - Power output
KW - Resistance training
KW - Women
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904751731&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.exger.2014.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.exger.2014.07.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 25014621
AN - SCOPUS:84904751731
SN - 0531-5565
VL - 58
SP - 51
EP - 57
JO - Experimental Gerontology
JF - Experimental Gerontology
ER -