Hacia una reconstrucción de los conflictos de la memoria. El caso del Museo de la Memoria y los Derechos Humanos en Chile

Resultado de la investigación: Review article

Resumen

The article asserts that memory plays an intermediary role between political present and history. As political present is intrinsically a matter of dispute, memory transfers this dispute into history by politically attributing cognitive or normative significance to selected events and periods. I argue that four different and potentially controversial forms of memory emerge from this, namely, a positive and a negative cognitive form of memory, on the one hand, and a negative and a positive socio-integrative form, on the other hand. The conflictive link between these forms of memory defines what I call controversies or disputes of memory. By elaborating on different theoretical reflections about the relation between politics, history, and memory, I firstly construe an original framework to analyze disputes of memory and subsequently I apply this to the public controversy between 2007 and 2016 regarding the installation and functioning of the Chilean Museum of Memory and Human Rights. The article concludes that criticisms of political positions concerning the relation between politics and history produce different and colliding forms of cognitive or socio-integrative memory, which creates a fluctuating time trajectory for memory.

Idioma originalSpanish
Páginas (desde-hasta)113-142
Número de páginas30
PublicaciónRevista Mad
N.º37
DOI
EstadoPublished - 2017

Huella dactilar

Chile
museum
human rights
reconstruction
history
history politics
present
criticism
politics
event

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Citar esto

@article{7acc87c0aa8041f6b143a56c12629fe4,
title = "Hacia una reconstrucci{\'o}n de los conflictos de la memoria. El caso del Museo de la Memoria y los Derechos Humanos en Chile",
abstract = "The article asserts that memory plays an intermediary role between political present and history. As political present is intrinsically a matter of dispute, memory transfers this dispute into history by politically attributing cognitive or normative significance to selected events and periods. I argue that four different and potentially controversial forms of memory emerge from this, namely, a positive and a negative cognitive form of memory, on the one hand, and a negative and a positive socio-integrative form, on the other hand. The conflictive link between these forms of memory defines what I call controversies or disputes of memory. By elaborating on different theoretical reflections about the relation between politics, history, and memory, I firstly construe an original framework to analyze disputes of memory and subsequently I apply this to the public controversy between 2007 and 2016 regarding the installation and functioning of the Chilean Museum of Memory and Human Rights. The article concludes that criticisms of political positions concerning the relation between politics and history produce different and colliding forms of cognitive or socio-integrative memory, which creates a fluctuating time trajectory for memory.",
keywords = "Controversy, Critique, Human rights, Memory, Museum of memory",
author = "Mauro Basaure",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.5354/0718-0527.2017.47278",
language = "Spanish",
pages = "113--142",
journal = "Revista Mad",
issn = "0718-0527",
publisher = "Universidad de Chile",
number = "37",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hacia una reconstrucción de los conflictos de la memoria. El caso del Museo de la Memoria y los Derechos Humanos en Chile

AU - Basaure, Mauro

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The article asserts that memory plays an intermediary role between political present and history. As political present is intrinsically a matter of dispute, memory transfers this dispute into history by politically attributing cognitive or normative significance to selected events and periods. I argue that four different and potentially controversial forms of memory emerge from this, namely, a positive and a negative cognitive form of memory, on the one hand, and a negative and a positive socio-integrative form, on the other hand. The conflictive link between these forms of memory defines what I call controversies or disputes of memory. By elaborating on different theoretical reflections about the relation between politics, history, and memory, I firstly construe an original framework to analyze disputes of memory and subsequently I apply this to the public controversy between 2007 and 2016 regarding the installation and functioning of the Chilean Museum of Memory and Human Rights. The article concludes that criticisms of political positions concerning the relation between politics and history produce different and colliding forms of cognitive or socio-integrative memory, which creates a fluctuating time trajectory for memory.

AB - The article asserts that memory plays an intermediary role between political present and history. As political present is intrinsically a matter of dispute, memory transfers this dispute into history by politically attributing cognitive or normative significance to selected events and periods. I argue that four different and potentially controversial forms of memory emerge from this, namely, a positive and a negative cognitive form of memory, on the one hand, and a negative and a positive socio-integrative form, on the other hand. The conflictive link between these forms of memory defines what I call controversies or disputes of memory. By elaborating on different theoretical reflections about the relation between politics, history, and memory, I firstly construe an original framework to analyze disputes of memory and subsequently I apply this to the public controversy between 2007 and 2016 regarding the installation and functioning of the Chilean Museum of Memory and Human Rights. The article concludes that criticisms of political positions concerning the relation between politics and history produce different and colliding forms of cognitive or socio-integrative memory, which creates a fluctuating time trajectory for memory.

KW - Controversy

KW - Critique

KW - Human rights

KW - Memory

KW - Museum of memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029447742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5354/0718-0527.2017.47278

DO - 10.5354/0718-0527.2017.47278

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85029447742

SP - 113

EP - 142

JO - Revista Mad

JF - Revista Mad

SN - 0718-0527

IS - 37

ER -