Fiabilidad y validez de un instrumento que utiliza fotografías para medir la habilidad de diagnóstico diferencial de lesiones causadas por presión y/o por incontinencia

Heidi Hevia, José González, Francisca Viveros, Carime Cofré, Tiare Donoso, Ignacia Olivares, Melisa Shields

Resultado de la investigación: Article

Resumen

Aim: To evaluate the reliability and validity of an instrument that allows to measure the visual ability to identify and classify Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD), Pressure Ulcers (PU) and mixed lesions, by nursing professionals. Material and method: A self-administered instrument consisting of 14 photographs was applied to a convenience sample of 28 nurses. A set of 14 photographs were shown in which they were asked to identify and then classify the state of the lesion. In an exploratory manner, the nested reliability was calculated with Cronbach’s Alpha and the validity with Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Results: The initial reliability of the 14 photographs was low (Cronbach Alpha = 0.174), after removing 7 photographs the reliability became acceptable (Cronbach Alpha = 0.709). The presence of two dimensions was established: on the one hand the ability to diagnose IAD, which explains 35% of the variance, and secondly, the ability to diagnose PU, which explains 22% of the variance, whether they are separated or together in the same patient. IAD is better diagnosed than mixed lesions. Conclusion: The study provided 6 reliable and valid photos that can be used in future work to build a more robust instrument that can be used in Chile for training in the area. The studied sample shows strengths when diagnosing IAD and difficulties when diagnosing mixed lesions.

Idioma originalSpanish
Páginas (desde-hasta)59-67
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónCiencia y Enfermeria
Volumen23
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublished - 1 dic 2017

Huella dactilar

Dermatitis
Reproducibility of Results
Differential Diagnosis
Pressure
Pressure Ulcer
Wounds and Injuries
Chile
Principal Component Analysis
Nursing
Nurses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Citar esto

Hevia, Heidi ; González, José ; Viveros, Francisca ; Cofré, Carime ; Donoso, Tiare ; Olivares, Ignacia ; Shields, Melisa. / Fiabilidad y validez de un instrumento que utiliza fotografías para medir la habilidad de diagnóstico diferencial de lesiones causadas por presión y/o por incontinencia. En: Ciencia y Enfermeria. 2017 ; Vol. 23, N.º 3. pp. 59-67.
@article{6ef5f6b96d084b0dac557d12f7e8b064,
title = "Fiabilidad y validez de un instrumento que utiliza fotograf{\'i}as para medir la habilidad de diagn{\'o}stico diferencial de lesiones causadas por presi{\'o}n y/o por incontinencia",
abstract = "Aim: To evaluate the reliability and validity of an instrument that allows to measure the visual ability to identify and classify Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD), Pressure Ulcers (PU) and mixed lesions, by nursing professionals. Material and method: A self-administered instrument consisting of 14 photographs was applied to a convenience sample of 28 nurses. A set of 14 photographs were shown in which they were asked to identify and then classify the state of the lesion. In an exploratory manner, the nested reliability was calculated with Cronbach’s Alpha and the validity with Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Results: The initial reliability of the 14 photographs was low (Cronbach Alpha = 0.174), after removing 7 photographs the reliability became acceptable (Cronbach Alpha = 0.709). The presence of two dimensions was established: on the one hand the ability to diagnose IAD, which explains 35{\%} of the variance, and secondly, the ability to diagnose PU, which explains 22{\%} of the variance, whether they are separated or together in the same patient. IAD is better diagnosed than mixed lesions. Conclusion: The study provided 6 reliable and valid photos that can be used in future work to build a more robust instrument that can be used in Chile for training in the area. The studied sample shows strengths when diagnosing IAD and difficulties when diagnosing mixed lesions.",
keywords = "Diagnosis, Differential, Fecal incontinence, Photographs, Pressure ulcer, Validity and reliability",
author = "Heidi Hevia and Jos{\'e} Gonz{\'a}lez and Francisca Viveros and Carime Cofr{\'e} and Tiare Donoso and Ignacia Olivares and Melisa Shields",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4067/S0717-95532017000300059",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "23",
pages = "59--67",
journal = "Ciencia y Enfermeria",
issn = "0717-2079",
publisher = "Universidad de Concepcion, Facultad de Medicina. Departamento de Enfermeria",
number = "3",

}

Fiabilidad y validez de un instrumento que utiliza fotografías para medir la habilidad de diagnóstico diferencial de lesiones causadas por presión y/o por incontinencia. / Hevia, Heidi; González, José; Viveros, Francisca; Cofré, Carime; Donoso, Tiare; Olivares, Ignacia; Shields, Melisa.

En: Ciencia y Enfermeria, Vol. 23, N.º 3, 01.12.2017, p. 59-67.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fiabilidad y validez de un instrumento que utiliza fotografías para medir la habilidad de diagnóstico diferencial de lesiones causadas por presión y/o por incontinencia

AU - Hevia, Heidi

AU - González, José

AU - Viveros, Francisca

AU - Cofré, Carime

AU - Donoso, Tiare

AU - Olivares, Ignacia

AU - Shields, Melisa

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Aim: To evaluate the reliability and validity of an instrument that allows to measure the visual ability to identify and classify Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD), Pressure Ulcers (PU) and mixed lesions, by nursing professionals. Material and method: A self-administered instrument consisting of 14 photographs was applied to a convenience sample of 28 nurses. A set of 14 photographs were shown in which they were asked to identify and then classify the state of the lesion. In an exploratory manner, the nested reliability was calculated with Cronbach’s Alpha and the validity with Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Results: The initial reliability of the 14 photographs was low (Cronbach Alpha = 0.174), after removing 7 photographs the reliability became acceptable (Cronbach Alpha = 0.709). The presence of two dimensions was established: on the one hand the ability to diagnose IAD, which explains 35% of the variance, and secondly, the ability to diagnose PU, which explains 22% of the variance, whether they are separated or together in the same patient. IAD is better diagnosed than mixed lesions. Conclusion: The study provided 6 reliable and valid photos that can be used in future work to build a more robust instrument that can be used in Chile for training in the area. The studied sample shows strengths when diagnosing IAD and difficulties when diagnosing mixed lesions.

AB - Aim: To evaluate the reliability and validity of an instrument that allows to measure the visual ability to identify and classify Incontinence Associated Dermatitis (IAD), Pressure Ulcers (PU) and mixed lesions, by nursing professionals. Material and method: A self-administered instrument consisting of 14 photographs was applied to a convenience sample of 28 nurses. A set of 14 photographs were shown in which they were asked to identify and then classify the state of the lesion. In an exploratory manner, the nested reliability was calculated with Cronbach’s Alpha and the validity with Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Results: The initial reliability of the 14 photographs was low (Cronbach Alpha = 0.174), after removing 7 photographs the reliability became acceptable (Cronbach Alpha = 0.709). The presence of two dimensions was established: on the one hand the ability to diagnose IAD, which explains 35% of the variance, and secondly, the ability to diagnose PU, which explains 22% of the variance, whether they are separated or together in the same patient. IAD is better diagnosed than mixed lesions. Conclusion: The study provided 6 reliable and valid photos that can be used in future work to build a more robust instrument that can be used in Chile for training in the area. The studied sample shows strengths when diagnosing IAD and difficulties when diagnosing mixed lesions.

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Differential

KW - Fecal incontinence

KW - Photographs

KW - Pressure ulcer

KW - Validity and reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050344758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4067/S0717-95532017000300059

DO - 10.4067/S0717-95532017000300059

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 59

EP - 67

JO - Ciencia y Enfermeria

JF - Ciencia y Enfermeria

SN - 0717-2079

IS - 3

ER -