Evaluación clínica a 6 meses de restauraciones cervicales en lesiones no cariosas con resinas compuestas Bulk-fill: Estudio aleatorio doble ciego

Patricio Vildósola, Jorge Nakouzi, Sara Rodriguez, Alexandra Reyes, Jenifer Reyes, Camila Conejeros

Resultado de la investigación: Article

Resumen

Objective: To assess the six-month clinical outcome of restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) with two composite resins: Bulk-Fill and nanohybrid resin. Materials and methods: Fifty-one patients, with three NCCLs each, were randomly allocated into three restoration groups: Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk-Fill (TB); Filtek Bulk-Fill (FB); y Filtek Z350XT (Z350). Adhesive techniques and restorative procedures were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions for the different materials. A 4mm increment was applied in TB and FB, and increments of =2mm depth were applied in Z350. Restorations were assessed by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at six months according to the FDI World Dental Federation guidelines (1: excellent, 2: acceptable, 3: sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: unacceptable) in Marginal Staining (MS), Fracture-Retention (FR), Marginal Adaptation (MA), Postoperative Sensitivity (S) and Caries (C). Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison between baseline and 6 months, and Kruskal-Wallis for the comparison of the three groups at six months (95% significance). Results: Forty-six patients with a total of 138 restorations attended a check-up at six months and were evaluated with excellent clinical outcome. In MS, 91.2% for Z350 and 97.8% for FB and TB; in FR, 97.8% for Z350 and 100% for FB and TB; in MA, 95.6% for Z350, 97.8% for FB and 100% for TN; in S, 95.6% for all three groups; and 100% for C. No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups nor in the comparison between the baseline and 6 months (p>0.05) Conclusion: No significant differences are observed between the three groups of resins in the parameters of MS, MA, S, FR and C regarding clinical outcome at six months.

Idioma originalSpanish
Páginas (desde-hasta)210-219
Número de páginas10
PublicaciónJournal of Oral Research
Volumen8
N.º3
DOI
EstadoPublished - 1 ene 2019

Huella dactilar

Randomized Controlled Trials
Staining and Labeling
Composite Resins
Adhesives
Tooth
Guidelines
Tetric ceram

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Citar esto

Vildósola, Patricio ; Nakouzi, Jorge ; Rodriguez, Sara ; Reyes, Alexandra ; Reyes, Jenifer ; Conejeros, Camila. / Evaluación clínica a 6 meses de restauraciones cervicales en lesiones no cariosas con resinas compuestas Bulk-fill : Estudio aleatorio doble ciego. En: Journal of Oral Research. 2019 ; Vol. 8, N.º 3. pp. 210-219.
@article{6177f672d6eb42bfb16bd4c351a2600d,
title = "Evaluaci{\'o}n cl{\'i}nica a 6 meses de restauraciones cervicales en lesiones no cariosas con resinas compuestas Bulk-fill: Estudio aleatorio doble ciego",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the six-month clinical outcome of restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) with two composite resins: Bulk-Fill and nanohybrid resin. Materials and methods: Fifty-one patients, with three NCCLs each, were randomly allocated into three restoration groups: Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk-Fill (TB); Filtek Bulk-Fill (FB); y Filtek Z350XT (Z350). Adhesive techniques and restorative procedures were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions for the different materials. A 4mm increment was applied in TB and FB, and increments of =2mm depth were applied in Z350. Restorations were assessed by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at six months according to the FDI World Dental Federation guidelines (1: excellent, 2: acceptable, 3: sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: unacceptable) in Marginal Staining (MS), Fracture-Retention (FR), Marginal Adaptation (MA), Postoperative Sensitivity (S) and Caries (C). Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison between baseline and 6 months, and Kruskal-Wallis for the comparison of the three groups at six months (95{\%} significance). Results: Forty-six patients with a total of 138 restorations attended a check-up at six months and were evaluated with excellent clinical outcome. In MS, 91.2{\%} for Z350 and 97.8{\%} for FB and TB; in FR, 97.8{\%} for Z350 and 100{\%} for FB and TB; in MA, 95.6{\%} for Z350, 97.8{\%} for FB and 100{\%} for TN; in S, 95.6{\%} for all three groups; and 100{\%} for C. No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups nor in the comparison between the baseline and 6 months (p>0.05) Conclusion: No significant differences are observed between the three groups of resins in the parameters of MS, MA, S, FR and C regarding clinical outcome at six months.",
keywords = "Composite resins, Dental restoration, permanent, Filtek bulk fill, Randomized controlled trial, Tooth cervix",
author = "Patricio Vild{\'o}sola and Jorge Nakouzi and Sara Rodriguez and Alexandra Reyes and Jenifer Reyes and Camila Conejeros",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.17126/joralres.2019.032",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "8",
pages = "210--219",
journal = "Journal of Oral Research",
issn = "0719-2479",
publisher = "Universidad de Concepcion",
number = "3",

}

Evaluación clínica a 6 meses de restauraciones cervicales en lesiones no cariosas con resinas compuestas Bulk-fill : Estudio aleatorio doble ciego. / Vildósola, Patricio; Nakouzi, Jorge; Rodriguez, Sara; Reyes, Alexandra; Reyes, Jenifer; Conejeros, Camila.

En: Journal of Oral Research, Vol. 8, N.º 3, 01.01.2019, p. 210-219.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluación clínica a 6 meses de restauraciones cervicales en lesiones no cariosas con resinas compuestas Bulk-fill

T2 - Estudio aleatorio doble ciego

AU - Vildósola, Patricio

AU - Nakouzi, Jorge

AU - Rodriguez, Sara

AU - Reyes, Alexandra

AU - Reyes, Jenifer

AU - Conejeros, Camila

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To assess the six-month clinical outcome of restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) with two composite resins: Bulk-Fill and nanohybrid resin. Materials and methods: Fifty-one patients, with three NCCLs each, were randomly allocated into three restoration groups: Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk-Fill (TB); Filtek Bulk-Fill (FB); y Filtek Z350XT (Z350). Adhesive techniques and restorative procedures were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions for the different materials. A 4mm increment was applied in TB and FB, and increments of =2mm depth were applied in Z350. Restorations were assessed by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at six months according to the FDI World Dental Federation guidelines (1: excellent, 2: acceptable, 3: sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: unacceptable) in Marginal Staining (MS), Fracture-Retention (FR), Marginal Adaptation (MA), Postoperative Sensitivity (S) and Caries (C). Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison between baseline and 6 months, and Kruskal-Wallis for the comparison of the three groups at six months (95% significance). Results: Forty-six patients with a total of 138 restorations attended a check-up at six months and were evaluated with excellent clinical outcome. In MS, 91.2% for Z350 and 97.8% for FB and TB; in FR, 97.8% for Z350 and 100% for FB and TB; in MA, 95.6% for Z350, 97.8% for FB and 100% for TN; in S, 95.6% for all three groups; and 100% for C. No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups nor in the comparison between the baseline and 6 months (p>0.05) Conclusion: No significant differences are observed between the three groups of resins in the parameters of MS, MA, S, FR and C regarding clinical outcome at six months.

AB - Objective: To assess the six-month clinical outcome of restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) with two composite resins: Bulk-Fill and nanohybrid resin. Materials and methods: Fifty-one patients, with three NCCLs each, were randomly allocated into three restoration groups: Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk-Fill (TB); Filtek Bulk-Fill (FB); y Filtek Z350XT (Z350). Adhesive techniques and restorative procedures were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions for the different materials. A 4mm increment was applied in TB and FB, and increments of =2mm depth were applied in Z350. Restorations were assessed by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at six months according to the FDI World Dental Federation guidelines (1: excellent, 2: acceptable, 3: sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: unacceptable) in Marginal Staining (MS), Fracture-Retention (FR), Marginal Adaptation (MA), Postoperative Sensitivity (S) and Caries (C). Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison between baseline and 6 months, and Kruskal-Wallis for the comparison of the three groups at six months (95% significance). Results: Forty-six patients with a total of 138 restorations attended a check-up at six months and were evaluated with excellent clinical outcome. In MS, 91.2% for Z350 and 97.8% for FB and TB; in FR, 97.8% for Z350 and 100% for FB and TB; in MA, 95.6% for Z350, 97.8% for FB and 100% for TN; in S, 95.6% for all three groups; and 100% for C. No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups nor in the comparison between the baseline and 6 months (p>0.05) Conclusion: No significant differences are observed between the three groups of resins in the parameters of MS, MA, S, FR and C regarding clinical outcome at six months.

KW - Composite resins

KW - Dental restoration, permanent

KW - Filtek bulk fill

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Tooth cervix

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073732211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17126/joralres.2019.032

DO - 10.17126/joralres.2019.032

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073732211

VL - 8

SP - 210

EP - 219

JO - Journal of Oral Research

JF - Journal of Oral Research

SN - 0719-2479

IS - 3

ER -