Estandarización y automatización en medicina: El deber de cuidado del profesional entre la legítima confianza y la debida prudencia

The first part of this article deals with the debate on the limits of criminal medical malpractice, facing the standardization of clinical practices. Its critical consideration allows us to configure a paradigm of imputation capable of combining the interests of the patients with those of the health professionals. In the second part, the author raises the main hypothesis, arguing that the same imputation paradigm could allow regulating medical liability for adverse events provoked by the adoption of indications provided by Artificial Intelligence systems. In the conclusions, he highlights how standardisation and automation processes find insurmountable obstacles in the defence of pluralism, autonomy and the ethics of responsibility.