TY - JOUR
T1 - Engineering students' comprehension of phase diagram concepts
T2 - 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE 2020
AU - Sanchez-Mata, Oscar
AU - Brochu, Mathieu
AU - Zavala, Genaro
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial and technical support of Writing Lab,(휀TecLabs, Tecnologico de Monterr,e My exico, in the production of this work. Likewise, they acknowledge the McGill Engineering Doctoral Award (MEDA) and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT, Mexico) scholarships granted to Mr. Sanchez-Mata.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Engineering Education 2020.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/6/22
Y1 - 2020/6/22
N2 - Materials science is an essential discipline for students in the mechanical and metallurgical engineering programs because many of them find jobs in industries where materials are relevant, such as electronics, aerospace, and automobile. Phase diagrams have proven to be a topic in materials science in which students demonstrate alternate conceptions. An essential first step in constructing a pedagogical approach to teaching phase diagrams in a specific program is to assess the students' conceptions. There has been significant interest in improving the teaching of materials science in general and phase diagrams in particular in two top universities, one in Mexico and the other in Canada. In both universities, there are successful mechanical engineering programs in which materials science is part of the curricula. In this research, we implemented a project aimed to improve the students' conceptions of crucial concepts in materials science. In this work, as a first step, we used an instrument inspired by items from the Materials Science Concept Evaluation (MSCE) to assess students' understanding of concepts related to phase diagrams. In addition to multiple-choice questions, we asked for their reasoning to deepen our understanding of their conceptions. We added open-ended items with corresponding spaces for their reasoning. We administered that instrument to undergraduate engineering students from these two universities after the phase diagram topics were covered. With the analysis of the multiple-choice and open-ended questions combined with a qualitative method to categorize the students' approach to each item, we present in this paper the students' conceptions and difficulties they had with this topic. We concluded that students in both countries had difficulties with the identification of phase fractions, the compositions of both alloys and individual phases, and solid solubility in binary phase diagrams.
AB - Materials science is an essential discipline for students in the mechanical and metallurgical engineering programs because many of them find jobs in industries where materials are relevant, such as electronics, aerospace, and automobile. Phase diagrams have proven to be a topic in materials science in which students demonstrate alternate conceptions. An essential first step in constructing a pedagogical approach to teaching phase diagrams in a specific program is to assess the students' conceptions. There has been significant interest in improving the teaching of materials science in general and phase diagrams in particular in two top universities, one in Mexico and the other in Canada. In both universities, there are successful mechanical engineering programs in which materials science is part of the curricula. In this research, we implemented a project aimed to improve the students' conceptions of crucial concepts in materials science. In this work, as a first step, we used an instrument inspired by items from the Materials Science Concept Evaluation (MSCE) to assess students' understanding of concepts related to phase diagrams. In addition to multiple-choice questions, we asked for their reasoning to deepen our understanding of their conceptions. We added open-ended items with corresponding spaces for their reasoning. We administered that instrument to undergraduate engineering students from these two universities after the phase diagram topics were covered. With the analysis of the multiple-choice and open-ended questions combined with a qualitative method to categorize the students' approach to each item, we present in this paper the students' conceptions and difficulties they had with this topic. We concluded that students in both countries had difficulties with the identification of phase fractions, the compositions of both alloys and individual phases, and solid solubility in binary phase diagrams.
KW - Educational innovation
KW - Higher education
KW - Materials research education
KW - Phase diagrams
KW - STEM
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095765423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85095765423
SN - 2153-5965
VL - 2020-June
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
M1 - 605
Y2 - 22 June 2020 through 26 June 2020
ER -