TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of equal volume but different plyometric jump training intensities on components of physical fitness in physically active young males
AU - Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
AU - Moran, Jason
AU - Drury, Benjamin
AU - Williams, Mark
AU - Keogh, Justin W.
AU - Chaabene, Helmi
AU - Granacher, Urs
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Ó 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Ramirez-Campillo, R, Moran, J, Drury, B, Williams, M, Keogh, JW, Chaabene, H, and Granacher, U. Effects of equal volume but different plyometric jump training intensities on components of physical fitness in physically active young males. J Strength Cond Res 35(7): 1916–1923, 2021—An 8-week single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effects of separate programs of equal volume, but different intensity, plyometric jump training (PJT), on physical fitness in healthy adults. Thirty-eight physically active males (mean age: 21.8 6 2.5 years) participated. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of 3 PJT groups or a control (CON, n = 9) according to their jump performance. Plyometric jump training was conducted at maximal (PJT-100, n = 10), high (PJT-80, n = 9), or moderate (PJT-65, n = 10) intensity within each group. Baseline and follow-up tests were performed for the assessment of countermovement jump (CMJ) height, CMJ height with arm swing (CMJA), and drop jump height from a 20-cm drop box (DJ20), linear speed (30 m), and change-of-direction speed (CODS) (the Illinois CODS test). Results revealed significant group 3 time interactions for CMJ, CMJA, DJ20, 30-m sprint, and CODS (all p, 0.001; d = 0.39–0.76). Post hoc analyses showed significant improvements in all 5 fitness measures for PJT-100 (all p, 0.01, D3.7–13.5%, d = 0.26–1.4). For PJT-80, 3 of 5 fitness tests demonstrated significant change (CMJ: p, 0.001, D5.9%, d = 0.33; CMJA: p, 0.001, D7.0%, d = 0.43; CODS: p, 0.001, D3.9%, d = 0.9), and for PJT-65, only 1 test was significant (CMJ: p, 0.05, D2.8%, d = 0.15). No significant changes were observed in CON. Except for similar gains in DJ20 and 30-m sprint in PJT-100 and PJT-80, gains in physical fitness were, in general, greater (p, 0.05) after PJT-100 vs. PJT-80 vs. PJT-65 vs. CON. Therefore, maximal PJT intensity may induce larger physical fitness gains, although high and moderate intensities may also be useful, but to a lesser extent.
AB - Ramirez-Campillo, R, Moran, J, Drury, B, Williams, M, Keogh, JW, Chaabene, H, and Granacher, U. Effects of equal volume but different plyometric jump training intensities on components of physical fitness in physically active young males. J Strength Cond Res 35(7): 1916–1923, 2021—An 8-week single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effects of separate programs of equal volume, but different intensity, plyometric jump training (PJT), on physical fitness in healthy adults. Thirty-eight physically active males (mean age: 21.8 6 2.5 years) participated. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of 3 PJT groups or a control (CON, n = 9) according to their jump performance. Plyometric jump training was conducted at maximal (PJT-100, n = 10), high (PJT-80, n = 9), or moderate (PJT-65, n = 10) intensity within each group. Baseline and follow-up tests were performed for the assessment of countermovement jump (CMJ) height, CMJ height with arm swing (CMJA), and drop jump height from a 20-cm drop box (DJ20), linear speed (30 m), and change-of-direction speed (CODS) (the Illinois CODS test). Results revealed significant group 3 time interactions for CMJ, CMJA, DJ20, 30-m sprint, and CODS (all p, 0.001; d = 0.39–0.76). Post hoc analyses showed significant improvements in all 5 fitness measures for PJT-100 (all p, 0.01, D3.7–13.5%, d = 0.26–1.4). For PJT-80, 3 of 5 fitness tests demonstrated significant change (CMJ: p, 0.001, D5.9%, d = 0.33; CMJA: p, 0.001, D7.0%, d = 0.43; CODS: p, 0.001, D3.9%, d = 0.9), and for PJT-65, only 1 test was significant (CMJ: p, 0.05, D2.8%, d = 0.15). No significant changes were observed in CON. Except for similar gains in DJ20 and 30-m sprint in PJT-100 and PJT-80, gains in physical fitness were, in general, greater (p, 0.05) after PJT-100 vs. PJT-80 vs. PJT-65 vs. CON. Therefore, maximal PJT intensity may induce larger physical fitness gains, although high and moderate intensities may also be useful, but to a lesser extent.
KW - Athletes
KW - Athletic performance
KW - Muscle strength
KW - Plyometric exercise
KW - Resistance training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108741783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003057
DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003057
M3 - Article
C2 - 30741877
AN - SCOPUS:85108741783
SN - 1064-8011
VL - 35
SP - 1916
EP - 1923
JO - Journal of strength and conditioning research
JF - Journal of strength and conditioning research
IS - 7
ER -