DOCENCIA EN EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR: CRITERIOS Y ESTÁNDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE

Alejandro Pérez Carvajal; Juan Pablo  Catalán Cueto

doi:10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850

DOCENCIA EN EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR: CRITERIOS Y ESTÁNDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE

Alejandro Pérez Carvajal, Juan Pablo Catalán Cueto

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › revisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

This article reveals the criteria and quality standards for the institutional accreditation of the university subsystem, Law 21,091. It asks: How is the dimension of teaching and the training process understood from the criteria and quality standards for institutional accreditation? The objective is to analyze the characteristics that are manifested explicitly and implicitly on this dimension. The methodology is a documentary study from direct and indirect sources. The conclusions express the need to disaggregate the elements concerning criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Teaching Dimension and Results of the Training Process.

Título traducido de la contribución	TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: CRITERIA AND STANDARDS OF QUALITY IN CHILE
Idioma original	Español
Publicación	Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades
Volumen	11
DOI	https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850
Estado	Publicada - 2 dic. 2022

Palabras clave

Accreditation
Criteria and Standards
Higher education
Quality
Quality assurance
Teaching
University

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

Artes y Humanidades General

Acceder al documento

10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850

Otros archivos y enlaces

Enlace a la publicación en Scopus

Citar esto

@article{9109f246507345bfadce4fe95fc65043,

title = "DOCENCIA EN EDUCACI{\'O}N SUPERIOR: CRITERIOS Y EST{\'A}NDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE",

abstract = "This article reveals the criteria and quality standards for the institutional accreditation of the university subsystem, Law 21,091. It asks: How is the dimension of teaching and the training process understood from the criteria and quality standards for institutional accreditation? The objective is to analyze the characteristics that are manifested explicitly and implicitly on this dimension. The methodology is a documentary study from direct and indirect sources. The conclusions express the need to disaggregate the elements concerning criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Teaching Dimension and Results of the Training Process.",

keywords = "Accreditation, Criteria and Standards, Higher education, Quality, Quality assurance, Teaching, University",

author = "Carvajal, {Alejandro P{\'e}rez} and {Catal{\'a}n Cueto}, {Juan Pablo}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} GKA Ediciones, authors.",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

day = "2",

doi = "10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850",

language = "Espa{\~n}ol",

volume = "11",

journal = "Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades",

issn = "2695-9623",

publisher = "Eagora Science",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - DOCENCIA EN EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR

T2 - CRITERIOS Y ESTÁNDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE

AU - Carvajal, Alejandro Pérez

AU - Catalán Cueto, Juan Pablo

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © GKA Ediciones, authors.

PY - 2022/12/2

Y1 - 2022/12/2

N2 - This article reveals the criteria and quality standards for the institutional accreditation of the university subsystem, Law 21,091. It asks: How is the dimension of teaching and the training process understood from the criteria and quality standards for institutional accreditation? The objective is to analyze the characteristics that are manifested explicitly and implicitly on this dimension. The methodology is a documentary study from direct and indirect sources. The conclusions express the need to disaggregate the elements concerning criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Teaching Dimension and Results of the Training Process.

AB - This article reveals the criteria and quality standards for the institutional accreditation of the university subsystem, Law 21,091. It asks: How is the dimension of teaching and the training process understood from the criteria and quality standards for institutional accreditation? The objective is to analyze the characteristics that are manifested explicitly and implicitly on this dimension. The methodology is a documentary study from direct and indirect sources. The conclusions express the need to disaggregate the elements concerning criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Teaching Dimension and Results of the Training Process.

KW - Accreditation

KW - Criteria and Standards

KW - Higher education

KW - Quality

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Teaching

KW - University

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143673545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850

DO - 10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850

M3 - Artículo

AN - SCOPUS:85143673545

SN - 2695-9623

VL - 11

JO - Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

JF - Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

ER -

DOCENCIA EN EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR: CRITERIOS Y ESTÁNDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE

Resumen

Palabras clave

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto