TY - JOUR
T1 - Considering the effect of sexism on psychological intimate partner violence
T2 - A study with imprisoned men
AU - Juarros-Basterretxea, Joel
AU - Overall, Nickola
AU - Herrero, Juan
AU - Rodríguez-Díaz, Francisco J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Support for this research was provided by FEDER founds from Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO-17-PSI2016-77484-P), and Severo Ochoa scholarship (BP14153) from Foundation for the Promotion in Asturias of Applied Scientific Research and Technology (FICYT, Asturias, Spain). Correspondence: [email protected] (J. Juarros-Basterretxea).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid.
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - Psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most prevalent form of IPV and is often thought to precede physical IPV. However, psychological IPV often occurs independently of other forms of IPV, and it can often emerge during routine relationship interactions. Using data from imprisoned male offenders we investigate the effect of hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes on psychological IPV and the hypothesized mediating role of positive attitudes toward IPV and this effect when accounting for broader risk factors at the levels of community (social disorder), family-of-origin (conflictive climate in family of origin), and personality (antisocial personality traits) variables. The sample involved 196 male inmates of the Penitentiary Center of Villabona (Asturias, Spain). Structural equation models result showed significant total, direct and indirect effect of hostile sexism on psychological IPV, but not of benevolent sexism. When individual, family-of-origin, and community variables were considered, however, hostile sexism showed only an indirect effect on psychological IPV via positive attitudes toward abuse. These results are discussed in light of the debate of the role of sexist attitudes in the psychological IPV explanation when broader models are considered.
AB - Psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most prevalent form of IPV and is often thought to precede physical IPV. However, psychological IPV often occurs independently of other forms of IPV, and it can often emerge during routine relationship interactions. Using data from imprisoned male offenders we investigate the effect of hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes on psychological IPV and the hypothesized mediating role of positive attitudes toward IPV and this effect when accounting for broader risk factors at the levels of community (social disorder), family-of-origin (conflictive climate in family of origin), and personality (antisocial personality traits) variables. The sample involved 196 male inmates of the Penitentiary Center of Villabona (Asturias, Spain). Structural equation models result showed significant total, direct and indirect effect of hostile sexism on psychological IPV, but not of benevolent sexism. When individual, family-of-origin, and community variables were considered, however, hostile sexism showed only an indirect effect on psychological IPV via positive attitudes toward abuse. These results are discussed in light of the debate of the role of sexist attitudes in the psychological IPV explanation when broader models are considered.
KW - Ecological framework
KW - Inmates
KW - Intimate partner violence
KW - Psychological aggression
KW - Sexist attitudes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070382918&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5093/EJPALC2019A1
DO - 10.5093/EJPALC2019A1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85070382918
SN - 1889-1861
VL - 11
SP - 61
EP - 69
JO - European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
JF - European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context
IS - 2
ER -