Assessment of scientific profiles and capabilities of Ph.D. programs in Chile: A scientometric approach

M. Krauskopf, María Inés Vera

Resultado de la investigación: Article

6 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

It is well known that the quality of a doctorate program is related to the level of involvement of its faculty in research. Thus, we worked with the hypothesis that postulates that if the in-house scientific output of the core faculty involved in a Ph.D. program can be appraised in such a manner that the achievements render quantitative and qualitative indicators, it is possible to depict profiles amenable for comparisons. We describe the methodology, that uses performance scientometric indicators, and results obtained after studying five Ph.D. programs in the field of Cell and Molecular Biology/Biochemistry in three different Chilean universities and show that the approach serves to portray the in-house capacity of each program vis a vis national and international standards.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)569-577
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónScientometrics
Volumen40
N.º3
EstadoPublished - 1997

Huella dactilar

Cytology
Biochemistry
Molecular biology
Chile
biochemistry
biology
university
methodology
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Citar esto

Krauskopf, M. ; Vera, María Inés. / Assessment of scientific profiles and capabilities of Ph.D. programs in Chile : A scientometric approach. En: Scientometrics. 1997 ; Vol. 40, N.º 3. pp. 569-577.
@article{a49c3c3880fe4ac8a2526e8fcad0d9d7,
title = "Assessment of scientific profiles and capabilities of Ph.D. programs in Chile: A scientometric approach",
abstract = "It is well known that the quality of a doctorate program is related to the level of involvement of its faculty in research. Thus, we worked with the hypothesis that postulates that if the in-house scientific output of the core faculty involved in a Ph.D. program can be appraised in such a manner that the achievements render quantitative and qualitative indicators, it is possible to depict profiles amenable for comparisons. We describe the methodology, that uses performance scientometric indicators, and results obtained after studying five Ph.D. programs in the field of Cell and Molecular Biology/Biochemistry in three different Chilean universities and show that the approach serves to portray the in-house capacity of each program vis a vis national and international standards.",
author = "M. Krauskopf and Vera, {Mar{\'i}a In{\'e}s}",
year = "1997",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "569--577",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Assessment of scientific profiles and capabilities of Ph.D. programs in Chile : A scientometric approach. / Krauskopf, M.; Vera, María Inés.

En: Scientometrics, Vol. 40, N.º 3, 1997, p. 569-577.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of scientific profiles and capabilities of Ph.D. programs in Chile

T2 - A scientometric approach

AU - Krauskopf, M.

AU - Vera, María Inés

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - It is well known that the quality of a doctorate program is related to the level of involvement of its faculty in research. Thus, we worked with the hypothesis that postulates that if the in-house scientific output of the core faculty involved in a Ph.D. program can be appraised in such a manner that the achievements render quantitative and qualitative indicators, it is possible to depict profiles amenable for comparisons. We describe the methodology, that uses performance scientometric indicators, and results obtained after studying five Ph.D. programs in the field of Cell and Molecular Biology/Biochemistry in three different Chilean universities and show that the approach serves to portray the in-house capacity of each program vis a vis national and international standards.

AB - It is well known that the quality of a doctorate program is related to the level of involvement of its faculty in research. Thus, we worked with the hypothesis that postulates that if the in-house scientific output of the core faculty involved in a Ph.D. program can be appraised in such a manner that the achievements render quantitative and qualitative indicators, it is possible to depict profiles amenable for comparisons. We describe the methodology, that uses performance scientometric indicators, and results obtained after studying five Ph.D. programs in the field of Cell and Molecular Biology/Biochemistry in three different Chilean universities and show that the approach serves to portray the in-house capacity of each program vis a vis national and international standards.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347140281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0347140281

VL - 40

SP - 569

EP - 577

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 3

ER -