TY - JOUR
T1 - An electrostatic interaction correction for improved crystal density prediction
AU - Politzer, Peter
AU - Martinez, Jorge
AU - Murray, Jane S.
AU - Concha, Monica C.
AU - Toro-Labbé, Alejandro
PY - 2009/6/1
Y1 - 2009/6/1
N2 - Recent work by others has shown that the densities of C,H,N,O molecular crystals are, in many instances, given quite well by the formula M/Vm, in which M is the molecular mass and Vm is the volume of the isolated gas phase molecule that is enclosed by the 0.001 au contour of its electronic density. About 41% of the predictions were in error by less than 0.030 g/cm3, and 63% by less than 0.050 g/cm3. However, this leaves more than one-third of the compounds with errors greater than 0.050 g/cm3, or in some instances, 0.100 g/cm3. This may indicate that intermolecular interactions within the crystal are not being adequately taken into account in these cases. Accordingly, the effectiveness of including a second term that reflects the strengths, variabilities and degree of balance of the positive and negative electrostatic potentials computed on the surfaces of the isolated molecules, has been included. The database was selected such that half of the densities predicted by M/Vm had errors larger than 0.050 g/cm3. The introduction of the electrostatic interaction correction produced a marked improvement. Overall, 78% of the predictions are within 0.050 g/cm3 of experiment, with 50% within 0.030 g/cm3. Among those that originally all had errors larger than 0.050 g/cm3, 67% are now less. The reasons for the better performance of the dual-variable formula are analysed.
AB - Recent work by others has shown that the densities of C,H,N,O molecular crystals are, in many instances, given quite well by the formula M/Vm, in which M is the molecular mass and Vm is the volume of the isolated gas phase molecule that is enclosed by the 0.001 au contour of its electronic density. About 41% of the predictions were in error by less than 0.030 g/cm3, and 63% by less than 0.050 g/cm3. However, this leaves more than one-third of the compounds with errors greater than 0.050 g/cm3, or in some instances, 0.100 g/cm3. This may indicate that intermolecular interactions within the crystal are not being adequately taken into account in these cases. Accordingly, the effectiveness of including a second term that reflects the strengths, variabilities and degree of balance of the positive and negative electrostatic potentials computed on the surfaces of the isolated molecules, has been included. The database was selected such that half of the densities predicted by M/Vm had errors larger than 0.050 g/cm3. The introduction of the electrostatic interaction correction produced a marked improvement. Overall, 78% of the predictions are within 0.050 g/cm3 of experiment, with 50% within 0.030 g/cm3. Among those that originally all had errors larger than 0.050 g/cm3, 67% are now less. The reasons for the better performance of the dual-variable formula are analysed.
KW - Crystal density
KW - Electrostatic interaction correction
KW - Electrostatic potential
KW - Energetic compounds
KW - Molecular volume
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349448483&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00268970903156306
DO - 10.1080/00268970903156306
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:70349448483
SN - 0026-8976
VL - 107
SP - 2095
EP - 2101
JO - Molecular Physics
JF - Molecular Physics
IS - 19
ER -