TY - JOUR
T1 - An eight to thirteen hertz cut-off low pass filter is more appropriate to treat isoinertial accelerometry signals during jumping
AU - De la Fuente, Carlos
AU - Cruz-Montencinos, Carlos
AU - Pena Y Lillo, Roberto
AU - Chamorro, Claudio
AU - Henriquez, Hugo
AU - Ramirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors’ Contribution: Study concept and design: Carlos De la Fuente; acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript: Carlos De la Fuente, Carlos Cruz-Montecinos, Roberto Pena y Lillo, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, and Hugo Henriquez; analysis and interpretation of data, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Carlos De la Fuente, Carlos Cruz-Montecinos, Roberto Pena y Lillo, Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo, and Hugo Henriquez; statistical analysis: Carlos De la Fuente, Carlos Cruz-Montecinos, Claudio Chamorro, and Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; administrative, technical, and material support: Carlos De la Fuente; study supervision: Carlos De la Fuente. Conflict of Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Funding/Support: The present research was supported by the authors.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Background: Advances in micro-electromechanical systems have made the massive use of isoinertial accelerometry units (IAU) possible in multiple fields. Particularly, in sport and sport-rehabilitation contexts, jumping is now commonly assessed through IAU. However, due to the noise contained in the register, the treatment for signals coming from IAUs may affect the mechanical outputs such as work or power, which need simple and double integration of the accelerometry signal to obtain it. Objectives: To determine the most appropriate (stable) cut-off low pass Butterworth filter parameters for unweight and propulsion phases to treat signals from a countermovement jump. Methods: Twenty-seven recreational athletes (age, 20.5 ± 3.0 years; body mass index, 21.9 ± 2.2 kg/m2) were assessed using an IAU (iPhone IV®) attached at the sacrum level to obtain mechanical output from the acceleration signals during countermovement jumping. To select the most stable cut-off filter parameters during the unweight and propulsion phases of the jumps, the following criteria were used: 80-95% of accounted variance of correlation coefficients determined between the raw and filtered signal, and individual variance lower than 5% for simple and double integration. Results: The cut-off low pass interval of 8-13 Hz generated 80.8-94.5% in the accounted variance and individual variance lower than 5%. Conclusions: An 8-13 Hz cut-off low pass filter is more appropriate to treat isoinertial accelerometry signals during jumping.
AB - Background: Advances in micro-electromechanical systems have made the massive use of isoinertial accelerometry units (IAU) possible in multiple fields. Particularly, in sport and sport-rehabilitation contexts, jumping is now commonly assessed through IAU. However, due to the noise contained in the register, the treatment for signals coming from IAUs may affect the mechanical outputs such as work or power, which need simple and double integration of the accelerometry signal to obtain it. Objectives: To determine the most appropriate (stable) cut-off low pass Butterworth filter parameters for unweight and propulsion phases to treat signals from a countermovement jump. Methods: Twenty-seven recreational athletes (age, 20.5 ± 3.0 years; body mass index, 21.9 ± 2.2 kg/m2) were assessed using an IAU (iPhone IV®) attached at the sacrum level to obtain mechanical output from the acceleration signals during countermovement jumping. To select the most stable cut-off filter parameters during the unweight and propulsion phases of the jumps, the following criteria were used: 80-95% of accounted variance of correlation coefficients determined between the raw and filtered signal, and individual variance lower than 5% for simple and double integration. Results: The cut-off low pass interval of 8-13 Hz generated 80.8-94.5% in the accounted variance and individual variance lower than 5%. Conclusions: An 8-13 Hz cut-off low pass filter is more appropriate to treat isoinertial accelerometry signals during jumping.
KW - Accelerometry
KW - Countermovement Jump
KW - Variance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053631614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5812/asjsm.12351
DO - 10.5812/asjsm.12351
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85053631614
SN - 2008-000X
VL - 9
JO - Asian Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - Asian Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 3
M1 - e12351
ER -