Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Claudio Chamorro, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Carlos De La Fuente, Javiera Fuentes, Luis Javier Chirosa

Resultado de la investigación: Article

5 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

The purpose of the study is to establish absolute reliability and concurrent validity between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in lower extremity peak torque assessment. Medline, Embase, CINAHL databases were searched for studies related to psychometric properties in muscle dynamometry. Studies considering standard error of measurement SEM (%) or limit of agreement LOA (%) expressed as percentage of the mean, were considered to establish absolute reliability while studies using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were considered to establish concurrent validity between dynamometers. In total, 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The COSMIN checklist classified them between fair and poor. Using HHDs, knee extension LOA (%) was 33.59%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 23.91 to 43.26 and ankle plantar flexion LOA (%) was 48.87%, CI 35.19 to 62.56. Using IDs, hip adduction and extension; knee flexion and extension; and ankle dorsiflexion showed LOA (%) under 15%. Lower hip, knee, and ankle LOA (%) were obtained using an ID compared to HHD. ICC between devices ranged between 0.62, CI (0.37 to 0.87) for ankle dorsiflexion to 0.94, IC (0.91to 0.98) for hip adduction. Very high correlation were found for hip adductors and hip flexors and moderate correlations for knee flexors/extensors and ankle plantar/dorsiflexors.

Idioma originalEnglish
Páginas (desde-hasta)359-375
Número de páginas17
PublicaciónOpen Medicine (Poland)
Volumen12
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublished - 1 ene 2017

Huella dactilar

Ankle Joint
Hip Joint
Knee Joint
Reproducibility of Results
Ankle
Meta-Analysis
Hip
Hand
Knee
Confidence Intervals
Torque
Checklist
Psychometrics
Lower Extremity
Databases
Equipment and Supplies
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Citar esto

@article{259fbd23fb5b422984a61c9d21dc9904,
title = "Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint: Systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "The purpose of the study is to establish absolute reliability and concurrent validity between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in lower extremity peak torque assessment. Medline, Embase, CINAHL databases were searched for studies related to psychometric properties in muscle dynamometry. Studies considering standard error of measurement SEM ({\%}) or limit of agreement LOA ({\%}) expressed as percentage of the mean, were considered to establish absolute reliability while studies using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were considered to establish concurrent validity between dynamometers. In total, 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The COSMIN checklist classified them between fair and poor. Using HHDs, knee extension LOA ({\%}) was 33.59{\%}, 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 23.91 to 43.26 and ankle plantar flexion LOA ({\%}) was 48.87{\%}, CI 35.19 to 62.56. Using IDs, hip adduction and extension; knee flexion and extension; and ankle dorsiflexion showed LOA ({\%}) under 15{\%}. Lower hip, knee, and ankle LOA ({\%}) were obtained using an ID compared to HHD. ICC between devices ranged between 0.62, CI (0.37 to 0.87) for ankle dorsiflexion to 0.94, IC (0.91to 0.98) for hip adduction. Very high correlation were found for hip adductors and hip flexors and moderate correlations for knee flexors/extensors and ankle plantar/dorsiflexors.",
keywords = "Lower extremitie, Muscle strength, Reproducibility of results",
author = "Claudio Chamorro and Susan Armijo-Olivo and {De La Fuente}, Carlos and Javiera Fuentes and {Javier Chirosa}, Luis",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/med-2017-0052",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "359--375",
journal = "Open Medicine (Poland)",
issn = "2391-5463",
publisher = "Walter De Gruyter",
number = "1",

}

Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint : Systematic review and meta-analysis. / Chamorro, Claudio; Armijo-Olivo, Susan; De La Fuente, Carlos; Fuentes, Javiera; Javier Chirosa, Luis.

En: Open Medicine (Poland), Vol. 12, N.º 1, 01.01.2017, p. 359-375.

Resultado de la investigación: Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint

T2 - Systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Chamorro, Claudio

AU - Armijo-Olivo, Susan

AU - De La Fuente, Carlos

AU - Fuentes, Javiera

AU - Javier Chirosa, Luis

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The purpose of the study is to establish absolute reliability and concurrent validity between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in lower extremity peak torque assessment. Medline, Embase, CINAHL databases were searched for studies related to psychometric properties in muscle dynamometry. Studies considering standard error of measurement SEM (%) or limit of agreement LOA (%) expressed as percentage of the mean, were considered to establish absolute reliability while studies using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were considered to establish concurrent validity between dynamometers. In total, 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The COSMIN checklist classified them between fair and poor. Using HHDs, knee extension LOA (%) was 33.59%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 23.91 to 43.26 and ankle plantar flexion LOA (%) was 48.87%, CI 35.19 to 62.56. Using IDs, hip adduction and extension; knee flexion and extension; and ankle dorsiflexion showed LOA (%) under 15%. Lower hip, knee, and ankle LOA (%) were obtained using an ID compared to HHD. ICC between devices ranged between 0.62, CI (0.37 to 0.87) for ankle dorsiflexion to 0.94, IC (0.91to 0.98) for hip adduction. Very high correlation were found for hip adductors and hip flexors and moderate correlations for knee flexors/extensors and ankle plantar/dorsiflexors.

AB - The purpose of the study is to establish absolute reliability and concurrent validity between hand-held dynamometers (HHDs) and isokinetic dynamometers (IDs) in lower extremity peak torque assessment. Medline, Embase, CINAHL databases were searched for studies related to psychometric properties in muscle dynamometry. Studies considering standard error of measurement SEM (%) or limit of agreement LOA (%) expressed as percentage of the mean, were considered to establish absolute reliability while studies using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were considered to establish concurrent validity between dynamometers. In total, 17 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The COSMIN checklist classified them between fair and poor. Using HHDs, knee extension LOA (%) was 33.59%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 23.91 to 43.26 and ankle plantar flexion LOA (%) was 48.87%, CI 35.19 to 62.56. Using IDs, hip adduction and extension; knee flexion and extension; and ankle dorsiflexion showed LOA (%) under 15%. Lower hip, knee, and ankle LOA (%) were obtained using an ID compared to HHD. ICC between devices ranged between 0.62, CI (0.37 to 0.87) for ankle dorsiflexion to 0.94, IC (0.91to 0.98) for hip adduction. Very high correlation were found for hip adductors and hip flexors and moderate correlations for knee flexors/extensors and ankle plantar/dorsiflexors.

KW - Lower extremitie

KW - Muscle strength

KW - Reproducibility of results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032307585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/med-2017-0052

DO - 10.1515/med-2017-0052

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032307585

VL - 12

SP - 359

EP - 375

JO - Open Medicine (Poland)

JF - Open Medicine (Poland)

SN - 2391-5463

IS - 1

ER -