A Comparison of Social Dominance Theory and System Justification: The Role of Social Status in 19 Nations

Salvador Vargas-Salfate, Dario Paez, James H. Liu, Felicia Pratto, Homero Gil de Zúñiga

Resultado de la investigación: Article

  • 7 Citas

Resumen

This study tests specific competing hypotheses from social dominance theory/realistic conflict theory (RCT) versus system justification theory about the role of social status. In particular, it examines whether system justification belief and effects are stronger among people with low socioeconomic status, and in less socially developed and unequal nations than among better-off people and countries. A cross-national survey was carried out in 19 nations from the Americas, Western and Eastern Europe, Asia, and Oceania using representative online samples (N = 14,936, 50.15% women, Mage = 41.61 years). At the individual level, system justification beliefs, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, national identification, sociopolitical conservatism, sex, age, and social status were measured. At the national level, the human development index and the Gini index were used. Multilevel analyses performed indicated that results fit better with the social dominance/RCT approach, as system justification was higher in high-status and developed nations; further, associations between legitimizing ideologies and system justification were stronger among high-status people.

IdiomaEnglish
Páginas1060-1076
Número de páginas17
PublicaciónPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volumen44
Número de edición7
DOI
EstadoAccepted/In press - 1 mar 2018

Huella dactilar

Social Dominance
Developed Countries
Oceania
Authoritarianism
Multilevel Analysis
Eastern Europe
Far East
Human Development
Politics
Social Class
Social Theory
Conflict (Psychology)

Keywords

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology

    Citar esto

    Vargas-Salfate, Salvador ; Paez, Dario ; Liu, James H. ; Pratto, Felicia ; Gil de Zúñiga, Homero. / A Comparison of Social Dominance Theory and System Justification : The Role of Social Status in 19 Nations. En: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2018 ; Vol. 44, N.º 7. pp. 1060-1076.
    @article{8b64e7b15be447568bfaf483748c75a2,
    title = "A Comparison of Social Dominance Theory and System Justification: The Role of Social Status in 19 Nations",
    abstract = "This study tests specific competing hypotheses from social dominance theory/realistic conflict theory (RCT) versus system justification theory about the role of social status. In particular, it examines whether system justification belief and effects are stronger among people with low socioeconomic status, and in less socially developed and unequal nations than among better-off people and countries. A cross-national survey was carried out in 19 nations from the Americas, Western and Eastern Europe, Asia, and Oceania using representative online samples (N = 14,936, 50.15{\%} women, Mage = 41.61 years). At the individual level, system justification beliefs, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, national identification, sociopolitical conservatism, sex, age, and social status were measured. At the national level, the human development index and the Gini index were used. Multilevel analyses performed indicated that results fit better with the social dominance/RCT approach, as system justification was higher in high-status and developed nations; further, associations between legitimizing ideologies and system justification were stronger among high-status people.",
    keywords = "digital influence survey, legitimizing ideologies, national identification, social dominance, system justification",
    author = "Salvador Vargas-Salfate and Dario Paez and Liu, {James H.} and Felicia Pratto and {Gil de Z{\'u}{\~n}iga}, Homero",
    year = "2018",
    month = "3",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0146167218757455",
    language = "English",
    volume = "44",
    pages = "1060--1076",
    journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin",
    issn = "0146-1672",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "7",

    }

    A Comparison of Social Dominance Theory and System Justification : The Role of Social Status in 19 Nations. / Vargas-Salfate, Salvador; Paez, Dario; Liu, James H.; Pratto, Felicia; Gil de Zúñiga, Homero.

    En: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 44, N.º 7, 01.03.2018, p. 1060-1076.

    Resultado de la investigación: Article

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A Comparison of Social Dominance Theory and System Justification

    T2 - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

    AU - Vargas-Salfate, Salvador

    AU - Paez, Dario

    AU - Liu, James H.

    AU - Pratto, Felicia

    AU - Gil de Zúñiga, Homero

    PY - 2018/3/1

    Y1 - 2018/3/1

    N2 - This study tests specific competing hypotheses from social dominance theory/realistic conflict theory (RCT) versus system justification theory about the role of social status. In particular, it examines whether system justification belief and effects are stronger among people with low socioeconomic status, and in less socially developed and unequal nations than among better-off people and countries. A cross-national survey was carried out in 19 nations from the Americas, Western and Eastern Europe, Asia, and Oceania using representative online samples (N = 14,936, 50.15% women, Mage = 41.61 years). At the individual level, system justification beliefs, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, national identification, sociopolitical conservatism, sex, age, and social status were measured. At the national level, the human development index and the Gini index were used. Multilevel analyses performed indicated that results fit better with the social dominance/RCT approach, as system justification was higher in high-status and developed nations; further, associations between legitimizing ideologies and system justification were stronger among high-status people.

    AB - This study tests specific competing hypotheses from social dominance theory/realistic conflict theory (RCT) versus system justification theory about the role of social status. In particular, it examines whether system justification belief and effects are stronger among people with low socioeconomic status, and in less socially developed and unequal nations than among better-off people and countries. A cross-national survey was carried out in 19 nations from the Americas, Western and Eastern Europe, Asia, and Oceania using representative online samples (N = 14,936, 50.15% women, Mage = 41.61 years). At the individual level, system justification beliefs, right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, national identification, sociopolitical conservatism, sex, age, and social status were measured. At the national level, the human development index and the Gini index were used. Multilevel analyses performed indicated that results fit better with the social dominance/RCT approach, as system justification was higher in high-status and developed nations; further, associations between legitimizing ideologies and system justification were stronger among high-status people.

    KW - digital influence survey

    KW - legitimizing ideologies

    KW - national identification

    KW - social dominance

    KW - system justification

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044064446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0146167218757455

    DO - 10.1177/0146167218757455

    M3 - Article

    VL - 44

    SP - 1060

    EP - 1076

    JO - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

    JF - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

    SN - 0146-1672

    IS - 7

    ER -