A comparison between dead-beat and predictive control for a 7-level back-to-back Cascaded H-Bridge under fault conditions

Luca Tarisciotti; Pericle Zanchetta; Alan Watson; Jon Clare; Stefano Bifaretti

doi:10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646972

A comparison between dead-beat and predictive control for a 7-level back-to-back Cascaded H-Bridge under fault conditions

Luca Tarisciotti, Pericle Zanchetta, Alan Watson, Jon Clare, Stefano Bifaretti

Facultad Ingeniería

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a los tipos de informe/libro › Contribución a la conferencia

7 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Nowadays the interest in active networks is significant as a result of to the larger penetration of renewable energy sources connected to the grid. In this scenario, multilevel power converters and, in particular, Cascaded H-Bridge converters allow the required flexibility and reliability to be considered as a building block for active nodes for the future electrical grid. The control of the power converters is a key factor to obtain the desired performance in terms of grid current THD and reliability under fault conditions. In this paper two promising model based control techniques, respectively Dead-Beat and Predictive control, are compared under non-ideal conditions in order to evaluate control performance.

Idioma original	Inglés
Título de la publicación alojada	2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013
Páginas	2147-2154
Número de páginas	8
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646972
Estado	Publicada - 31 dic 2013
Evento	5th Annual IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exhibition, ECCE 2013 - Denver, CO, Estados Unidos Duración: 15 sep 2013 → 19 sep 2013

Serie de la publicación

Nombre	2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013

Otros

Otros	5th Annual IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exhibition, ECCE 2013
País	Estados Unidos
Ciudad	Denver, CO
Período	15/09/13 → 19/09/13

Áreas temáticas de ASJC Scopus

Ingeniería energética y tecnologías de la energía
Tecnología del combustible

Acceder al documento

10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646972

Link to publication in Scopus

Huella Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'A comparison between dead-beat and predictive control for a 7-level back-to-back Cascaded H-Bridge under fault conditions'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto

Tarisciotti, L., Zanchetta, P., Watson, A., Clare, J., & Bifaretti, S. (2013). A comparison between dead-beat and predictive control for a 7-level back-to-back Cascaded H-Bridge under fault conditions. En 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013 (pp. 2147-2154). [6646972] (2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646972

@inproceedings{ee40167865044997a8879a4ea527d134,

title = "A comparison between dead-beat and predictive control for a 7-level back-to-back Cascaded H-Bridge under fault conditions",

abstract = "Nowadays the interest in active networks is significant as a result of to the larger penetration of renewable energy sources connected to the grid. In this scenario, multilevel power converters and, in particular, Cascaded H-Bridge converters allow the required flexibility and reliability to be considered as a building block for active nodes for the future electrical grid. The control of the power converters is a key factor to obtain the desired performance in terms of grid current THD and reliability under fault conditions. In this paper two promising model based control techniques, respectively Dead-Beat and Predictive control, are compared under non-ideal conditions in order to evaluate control performance.",

author = "Luca Tarisciotti and Pericle Zanchetta and Alan Watson and Jon Clare and Stefano Bifaretti",

year = "2013",

month = dec,

day = "31",

doi = "10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646972",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781479903351",

series = "2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013",

pages = "2147--2154",

booktitle = "2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013",

note = "5th Annual IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exhibition, ECCE 2013 ; Conference date: 15-09-2013 Through 19-09-2013",

}

Tarisciotti, L, Zanchetta, P, Watson, A, Clare, J & Bifaretti, S 2013, A comparison between dead-beat and predictive control for a 7-level back-to-back Cascaded H-Bridge under fault conditions. En 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013., 6646972, 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013, pp. 2147-2154, 5th Annual IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exhibition, ECCE 2013, Denver, CO, Estados Unidos, 15/09/13. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646972

A comparison between dead-beat and predictive control for a 7-level back-to-back Cascaded H-Bridge under fault conditions. / Tarisciotti, Luca; Zanchetta, Pericle; Watson, Alan; Clare, Jon; Bifaretti, Stefano.

2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013. 2013. p. 2147-2154 6646972 (2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013).

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a los tipos de informe/libro › Contribución a la conferencia

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison between dead-beat and predictive control for a 7-level back-to-back Cascaded H-Bridge under fault conditions

AU - Tarisciotti, Luca

AU - Zanchetta, Pericle

AU - Watson, Alan

AU - Clare, Jon

AU - Bifaretti, Stefano

PY - 2013/12/31

Y1 - 2013/12/31

N2 - Nowadays the interest in active networks is significant as a result of to the larger penetration of renewable energy sources connected to the grid. In this scenario, multilevel power converters and, in particular, Cascaded H-Bridge converters allow the required flexibility and reliability to be considered as a building block for active nodes for the future electrical grid. The control of the power converters is a key factor to obtain the desired performance in terms of grid current THD and reliability under fault conditions. In this paper two promising model based control techniques, respectively Dead-Beat and Predictive control, are compared under non-ideal conditions in order to evaluate control performance.

AB - Nowadays the interest in active networks is significant as a result of to the larger penetration of renewable energy sources connected to the grid. In this scenario, multilevel power converters and, in particular, Cascaded H-Bridge converters allow the required flexibility and reliability to be considered as a building block for active nodes for the future electrical grid. The control of the power converters is a key factor to obtain the desired performance in terms of grid current THD and reliability under fault conditions. In this paper two promising model based control techniques, respectively Dead-Beat and Predictive control, are compared under non-ideal conditions in order to evaluate control performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891111145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646972

DO - 10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646972

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84891111145

SN - 9781479903351

T3 - 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013

SP - 2147

EP - 2154

BT - 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013

T2 - 5th Annual IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exhibition, ECCE 2013

Y2 - 15 September 2013 through 19 September 2013

ER -

Tarisciotti L, Zanchetta P, Watson A, Clare J, Bifaretti S. A comparison between dead-beat and predictive control for a 7-level back-to-back Cascaded H-Bridge under fault conditions. En 2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013. 2013. p. 2147-2154. 6646972. (2013 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646972