Validity and reliability of evaluating hip abductor strength using different normalization methods in a functional electromechanical device

Keyphrases

• Data Normalization 100%
• Normalization Method 100%
• Hip Abductor Strength 100%
• Electromechanical Devices 100%
• Supine Position 80%
• Dynamometer 60%
• Hip Abductor muscles 60%
• Side-lying Position 60%
• Body Mass 40%
• Coefficient of Variation 40%
• Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 40%
• Isometric Strength 40%
• Peak Force 40%
• Standing Position 40%
• Muscle Strength 20%
• Test-retest Reliability 20%
• Fat-free Mass 20%
• Strength Deficit 20%
• Pelvis 20%
• Data Normalization Method 20%
• Strength Data 20%
• Mass Data 20%

Nursing and Health Professions

• Dynamometer 100%
• Body Mass 66%
• Isometrics 66%
• Correlation Coefficient 66%
• Muscle Strength 33%
• Test Retest Reliability 33%
• Fat Free Mass 33%

Medicine and Dentistry

• Hip 100%
• Supine Position 80%
• Recumbency 60%
• Isometrics 40%
• Muscle Strength 20%
• Test Retest Reliability 20%
• Pelvis 20%
• Standing 20%
• Body Fat Mass 20%