The effect of disparagement humor on the acceptability of prejudice

Andrés Mendiburo-Seguel, Thomas E. Ford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two studies tested the hypothesis that disparagement humor increases the acceptability of prejudice against groups that occupy a position in society of “normative ambiguity”; prejudice against them is shifting from being completely acceptable to being completely unacceptable. In Study 1 we found that residents of Santiago, Chile perceive the group, gay men, as occupying this position of normative ambiguity. In contrast, they perceive prejudice against politicians as completely acceptable. Supporting our hypothesis, Study 2 showed that participants viewed an prejudice against gay men as more acceptable after reading jokes disparaging gay men in comparison to serious disparaging comments or no disparagement. Jokes disparaging politicians, however, did not make participants view prejudice against them as more acceptable compared to serious disparaging comments or no disparagement. Study 2 also revealed that jokes disparaging gay men increased the acceptability of prejudice against other normative ambiguity groups not targeted by the humor.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCurrent Psychology
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Wit and Humor
Chile
Reading
Sexual Minorities

Keywords

  • Disparagement humor
  • Normative window
  • Political humor
  • Prejudice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{75ff8d5badf34779b147153e612c1d0b,
title = "The effect of disparagement humor on the acceptability of prejudice",
abstract = "Two studies tested the hypothesis that disparagement humor increases the acceptability of prejudice against groups that occupy a position in society of “normative ambiguity”; prejudice against them is shifting from being completely acceptable to being completely unacceptable. In Study 1 we found that residents of Santiago, Chile perceive the group, gay men, as occupying this position of normative ambiguity. In contrast, they perceive prejudice against politicians as completely acceptable. Supporting our hypothesis, Study 2 showed that participants viewed an prejudice against gay men as more acceptable after reading jokes disparaging gay men in comparison to serious disparaging comments or no disparagement. Jokes disparaging politicians, however, did not make participants view prejudice against them as more acceptable compared to serious disparaging comments or no disparagement. Study 2 also revealed that jokes disparaging gay men increased the acceptability of prejudice against other normative ambiguity groups not targeted by the humor.",
keywords = "Disparagement humor, Normative window, Political humor, Prejudice",
author = "Andr{\'e}s Mendiburo-Seguel and Ford, {Thomas E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12144-019-00354-2",
language = "English",
journal = "Current Psychology",
issn = "1046-1310",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

The effect of disparagement humor on the acceptability of prejudice. / Mendiburo-Seguel, Andrés; Ford, Thomas E.

In: Current Psychology, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of disparagement humor on the acceptability of prejudice

AU - Mendiburo-Seguel, Andrés

AU - Ford, Thomas E.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Two studies tested the hypothesis that disparagement humor increases the acceptability of prejudice against groups that occupy a position in society of “normative ambiguity”; prejudice against them is shifting from being completely acceptable to being completely unacceptable. In Study 1 we found that residents of Santiago, Chile perceive the group, gay men, as occupying this position of normative ambiguity. In contrast, they perceive prejudice against politicians as completely acceptable. Supporting our hypothesis, Study 2 showed that participants viewed an prejudice against gay men as more acceptable after reading jokes disparaging gay men in comparison to serious disparaging comments or no disparagement. Jokes disparaging politicians, however, did not make participants view prejudice against them as more acceptable compared to serious disparaging comments or no disparagement. Study 2 also revealed that jokes disparaging gay men increased the acceptability of prejudice against other normative ambiguity groups not targeted by the humor.

AB - Two studies tested the hypothesis that disparagement humor increases the acceptability of prejudice against groups that occupy a position in society of “normative ambiguity”; prejudice against them is shifting from being completely acceptable to being completely unacceptable. In Study 1 we found that residents of Santiago, Chile perceive the group, gay men, as occupying this position of normative ambiguity. In contrast, they perceive prejudice against politicians as completely acceptable. Supporting our hypothesis, Study 2 showed that participants viewed an prejudice against gay men as more acceptable after reading jokes disparaging gay men in comparison to serious disparaging comments or no disparagement. Jokes disparaging politicians, however, did not make participants view prejudice against them as more acceptable compared to serious disparaging comments or no disparagement. Study 2 also revealed that jokes disparaging gay men increased the acceptability of prejudice against other normative ambiguity groups not targeted by the humor.

KW - Disparagement humor

KW - Normative window

KW - Political humor

KW - Prejudice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068868091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12144-019-00354-2

DO - 10.1007/s12144-019-00354-2

M3 - Article

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 1046-1310

ER -