The curious case of Lyα emitters: Growing younger from z ∼ 3 to z ∼ 2?

Viviana Acquaviva, Carlos Vargas, Eric Gawiser, Lucia Guaita

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lyα emitting (LAE) galaxies are thought to be progenitors of present-day L* galaxies. Clustering analyses have suggested that LAEs at z 3 might evolve into LAEs at z 2, but it is unclear whether the physical nature of these galaxies is compatible with this hypothesis. Several groups have investigated the properties of LAEs using spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting, but direct comparison of their results is complicated by inconsistencies in the treatment of the data and in the assumptions made in modeling the stellar populations, which are degenerate with the effects of galaxy evolution. By using the same data analysis pipeline and SED fitting software on two stacked samples of LAEs at z = 3.1 and z = 2.1, and by eliminating several systematic uncertainties that might cause a discrepancy, we determine that the physical properties of these two samples of galaxies are dramatically different. LAEs at z = 3.1 are found to be old (age 1Gyr) and metal-poor (Z < 0.2 Z ), while LAEs at z = 2.1 appear to be young (age 50Myr) and metal-rich (Z > Z ). The difference in the observed stellar ages makes it very unlikely that z = 3.1 LAEs evolve directly into z = 2.1 LAEs. Larger samples of galaxies, studies of individual objects, and spectroscopic measurements of metallicity at these redshifts are needed to confirm this picture, which is difficult to reconcile with the effects of 1Gyr of cosmological evolution.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberL26
JournalAstrophysical Journal Letters
Volume751
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Galaxy: evolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The curious case of Lyα emitters: Growing younger from z ∼ 3 to z ∼ 2?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this