TY - JOUR
T1 - Stomach content analysis in cephalopods
T2 - past research, current challenges, and future directions
AU - Ibáñez, Christian M.
AU - Riera, Rodrigo
AU - Leite, Tatiana
AU - Díaz-Santana-Iturrios, Mariana
AU - Rosa, Rui
AU - Pardo-Gandarillas, M. Cecilia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Abstract: Dietary descriptions based on stomach content are pervasive regardless of the biases concerning its methodology, statistics and descriptors. We here review different biases on the stomach content analysis, sample size, and indices used for cephalopods. These mollusks are key components in marine food webs and most are characterized as active predators, thus, knowledge of their feeding ecology based on stomach content analysis is of paramount importance. We suggest alternatives to describe dietary data using unbiased estimators. These are based on re-sampling, using published data of cephalopod stomach content, and conducting estimations using intervals. In our review, we detected that several studies found a high proportion of empty stomachs and highly digested preys, which influences the sample size with contents. In turn, sample size is positively associated with the number of prey species in the stomach contents. Moreover, many studies confuse the terms opportunistic vs. generalist predator and selective vs. specialist predator. Therefore, to improve the understanding of these concepts, we calculated niche-width indices and compared them with prey richness and evenness at individual and population levels. We also show that although most cephalopods exhibit generalized diet and wide trophic niche, their hunting strategy is selective and specialized at individual level. It is worth noting that the diet of over 90% of cephalopod species is not yet known, and thus, the number of trophic studies should increase to fill this gap of knowledge. We provide a series of recommendations to improve and correctly conduct and interpret the studies of stomach content for cephalopods. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - Abstract: Dietary descriptions based on stomach content are pervasive regardless of the biases concerning its methodology, statistics and descriptors. We here review different biases on the stomach content analysis, sample size, and indices used for cephalopods. These mollusks are key components in marine food webs and most are characterized as active predators, thus, knowledge of their feeding ecology based on stomach content analysis is of paramount importance. We suggest alternatives to describe dietary data using unbiased estimators. These are based on re-sampling, using published data of cephalopod stomach content, and conducting estimations using intervals. In our review, we detected that several studies found a high proportion of empty stomachs and highly digested preys, which influences the sample size with contents. In turn, sample size is positively associated with the number of prey species in the stomach contents. Moreover, many studies confuse the terms opportunistic vs. generalist predator and selective vs. specialist predator. Therefore, to improve the understanding of these concepts, we calculated niche-width indices and compared them with prey richness and evenness at individual and population levels. We also show that although most cephalopods exhibit generalized diet and wide trophic niche, their hunting strategy is selective and specialized at individual level. It is worth noting that the diet of over 90% of cephalopod species is not yet known, and thus, the number of trophic studies should increase to fill this gap of knowledge. We provide a series of recommendations to improve and correctly conduct and interpret the studies of stomach content for cephalopods. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
KW - Bias
KW - Cephalopods
KW - Diet
KW - Food sources
KW - Predation
KW - Stomach content
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105382571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11160-021-09653-z
DO - 10.1007/s11160-021-09653-z
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85105382571
SN - 0960-3166
VL - 31
SP - 505
EP - 522
JO - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
JF - Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
IS - 3
ER -