Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopy in adults. A systematic review

Javier Alejandro Moraga Concha, Ricardo Cartes-Velásquez, Carlos Manterola Delgado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the best treatment option for not complicated acute appendicitis (AA) in adult patients, between single incision laparoscopy (SIL) and conventional laparoscopy (CL), measured by morbidity associated with disease.

METHODS: Systematic review. Articles of adults diagnosed with AA treated by SIL or CL were analyzed. Databases included: MEDLINE, LILACS, IBECS, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane, using MeSH terms and free words. The studies were analyzed using the MINCIR methodology. Variables included: conversion rate, morbidity, hospital stay, surgery duration, and methodological quality (MQ) of primary studies. Averages, medians and weighted averages were calculated.

RESULTS: Thirteen articles were analyzed. For SIL and CL the conversion rate were 3.4% and 0.7%, the morbidity were 8% and6.5%, the hospital stay were 2.5 and 2.8 days, the surgery duration were 53.4 and 53.8 minutes, and the MQ were 14.3±6.6 and 16.0±6.9 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION: With the exception of the conversion rate, there are no differences between single incision laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy for the treatment of acute appendicitis in adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)826-831
Number of pages6
JournalActa Cirurgica Brasileira
Volume29
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014

Keywords

  • Appendectomy
  • Appendicitis
  • Laparoscopy
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopy in adults. A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this