TY - JOUR
T1 - Sealing of restorations with marginal defects does not affect their longevity
AU - Larenas, Juan Estay
AU - Casielles, Javier Martin
AU - Vildósola Grez, Patricio
AU - Villablanca, Claudia M.
AU - Mjör, Ivar A.
AU - Oliveira, Osmir Batista
AU - Laske, Mark
AU - Loomans, Bas A.
AU - De Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi
AU - Cortés, Gustavo Moncada
AU - Gordan, Valeria V.
AU - Opdam, Niek J.M.
AU - Fernández, Eduardo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Mosher and Linder, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate sealed amalgam and resin-based composite restorations after 12 years to determine whether sealing minor defects (micro-repairs) enhanced the longevity of restorations. Methods: 34 subjects aged 18-80 were recruited. This sample group underwent 137 restorations, including 51 resin-based composite (RC) and 86 amalgam (AM) restorations. Existing restorations with localized, marginal defects were assigned to one of two groups: (a) the Sealing group (n=48, 27 AM; 21 RC) or (b) the Control group (n=89, 59 AM; 30 RC). The quality of each restoration was scored according to the modified USPHS criteria by two examiners at the beginning of the study and after 1-5, 10, and 12 years. Kaplan Meier survival curves were created and a Cox regression was applied to investigate survival variables. Mantel Cox, Wilcoxon, and Friedman tests were performed for comparisons within groups. Results: After 12 years, no statistically significant differences were observed for the variables "restorative material" (P= 0.538) or "sealing yes/no" (P= 0.136) with respect to the longevity of the restorations. AH groups behaved similarly with regard to marginal adaptation, secondary caries, and tooth sensitivity (P> 0.05). Cumulatively, after a 12-year observation period, sealing minor restoration defects did not affect the longevity of the restorations.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate sealed amalgam and resin-based composite restorations after 12 years to determine whether sealing minor defects (micro-repairs) enhanced the longevity of restorations. Methods: 34 subjects aged 18-80 were recruited. This sample group underwent 137 restorations, including 51 resin-based composite (RC) and 86 amalgam (AM) restorations. Existing restorations with localized, marginal defects were assigned to one of two groups: (a) the Sealing group (n=48, 27 AM; 21 RC) or (b) the Control group (n=89, 59 AM; 30 RC). The quality of each restoration was scored according to the modified USPHS criteria by two examiners at the beginning of the study and after 1-5, 10, and 12 years. Kaplan Meier survival curves were created and a Cox regression was applied to investigate survival variables. Mantel Cox, Wilcoxon, and Friedman tests were performed for comparisons within groups. Results: After 12 years, no statistically significant differences were observed for the variables "restorative material" (P= 0.538) or "sealing yes/no" (P= 0.136) with respect to the longevity of the restorations. AH groups behaved similarly with regard to marginal adaptation, secondary caries, and tooth sensitivity (P> 0.05). Cumulatively, after a 12-year observation period, sealing minor restoration defects did not affect the longevity of the restorations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047356184&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 29630796
AN - SCOPUS:85047356184
SN - 0894-8275
VL - 31
SP - 107
EP - 112
JO - American Journal of Dentistry
JF - American Journal of Dentistry
IS - 2
ER -