TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence of the Bifid Mandibular Condyle and Its Relationship with Pathologies of the Temporomandibular Joint
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Juan José
AU - Navarro, Kora lle Keller
AU - Urbina, Pia
AU - Trujillo-Riveros, Martin
AU - Nova-Baeza, Pablo
AU - Orellana-Donoso, Mathias
AU - Rodriguez-Luengo, Macarena
AU - Beccerra Farfan, Alvaro
AU - Sanchis-Gimeno, Juan A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of anatomical variants in the bifid mandibular condyle (BMC) and report its association with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology. Methods: We searched the Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and LILACS databases from their inception up to September 2023. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction, and they also assessed the methodological quality with an assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA). Finally, the pooled prevalence was estimated using a random effects model. Results: A total of 50 studies met the eligibility criteria. Twenty studies, with a total of 88,625 subjects, were included in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of the bifid mandibular condyle (BMC) variant was 1% (95% CI = 1% to 2%). Conclusions: The correlation between the BMC and TMJ pathologies has a relatively low prevalence in studies that present a considerable number of subjects. From a clinical point of view, a direct association cannot be made between the presence of the BMC and TMJ pathologies or symptoms.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of anatomical variants in the bifid mandibular condyle (BMC) and report its association with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pathology. Methods: We searched the Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and LILACS databases from their inception up to September 2023. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction, and they also assessed the methodological quality with an assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA). Finally, the pooled prevalence was estimated using a random effects model. Results: A total of 50 studies met the eligibility criteria. Twenty studies, with a total of 88,625 subjects, were included in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of the bifid mandibular condyle (BMC) variant was 1% (95% CI = 1% to 2%). Conclusions: The correlation between the BMC and TMJ pathologies has a relatively low prevalence in studies that present a considerable number of subjects. From a clinical point of view, a direct association cannot be made between the presence of the BMC and TMJ pathologies or symptoms.
KW - anatomical variation
KW - anatomy mandibular condyle
KW - bifid mandibular condyle
KW - clinical anatomy
KW - temporomandibular joint pathologies
KW - trifid mandibular condyle
KW - variation mandibular condyle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175534452&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics13203282
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics13203282
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85175534452
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 13
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
IS - 20
M1 - 3282
ER -