Abstract
The modern effort to articulate Sovereignty and Law has as its horizon the treatment of the institutional confined to the structure of representation, from the application of Law to the configuration of the state. The representational plane of Law and its implementation of laws and rights are problematized, to expand its borders and dispute the operation of these classic associations. A fruitful path is opened to think about a conception of law and jurisprudence in relation to the Deleuzean institutional theory and its link with the social, stressing the binomial Law – representation to the maximum. The philosophy of law proposed by Deleuze establishes a basis, as a practice of singular cases that can be embodied in the Frenchman's own idea of immanent philosophy. There is a world to unfold in this perspective of law as a critique of the Law, opening another legal practice that resonates today. Therefore, the article aims to unravel, from a Deleuzean critical reading, a political normativity of rights that points to the relevance of jurisprudence as a variation, accounting for the distorting interaction of social experience with respect to law and also possible new dimensions of the institution.
Translated title of the contribution | Institution and Law in the Deleuzean Political Normative Turn: A Reading of Jurisprudence as Variation |
---|---|
Original language | Spanish |
Pages (from-to) | 136-160 |
Number of pages | 25 |
Journal | En-Claves del Pensamiento |
Volume | 35 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2024 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- History
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts
- Religious studies
- Philosophy
- Literature and Literary Theory