Evaluación clínica a 6 meses de restauraciones cervicales en lesiones no cariosas con resinas compuestas Bulk-fill: Estudio aleatorio doble ciego

Translated title of the contribution: Six month follow-up of two Bulk-fill composites in non-carious cervical lesions: Double blind randomized clinical trial

Patricio Vildósola, Jorge Nakouzi, Sara Rodriguez, Alexandra Reyes, Jenifer Reyes, Camila Conejeros

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the six-month clinical outcome of restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) with two composite resins: Bulk-Fill and nanohybrid resin. Materials and methods: Fifty-one patients, with three NCCLs each, were randomly allocated into three restoration groups: Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk-Fill (TB); Filtek Bulk-Fill (FB); y Filtek Z350XT (Z350). Adhesive techniques and restorative procedures were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions for the different materials. A 4mm increment was applied in TB and FB, and increments of =2mm depth were applied in Z350. Restorations were assessed by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at six months according to the FDI World Dental Federation guidelines (1: excellent, 2: acceptable, 3: sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: unacceptable) in Marginal Staining (MS), Fracture-Retention (FR), Marginal Adaptation (MA), Postoperative Sensitivity (S) and Caries (C). Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison between baseline and 6 months, and Kruskal-Wallis for the comparison of the three groups at six months (95% significance). Results: Forty-six patients with a total of 138 restorations attended a check-up at six months and were evaluated with excellent clinical outcome. In MS, 91.2% for Z350 and 97.8% for FB and TB; in FR, 97.8% for Z350 and 100% for FB and TB; in MA, 95.6% for Z350, 97.8% for FB and 100% for TN; in S, 95.6% for all three groups; and 100% for C. No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups nor in the comparison between the baseline and 6 months (p>0.05) Conclusion: No significant differences are observed between the three groups of resins in the parameters of MS, MA, S, FR and C regarding clinical outcome at six months.

Translated title of the contributionSix month follow-up of two Bulk-fill composites in non-carious cervical lesions: Double blind randomized clinical trial
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)210-219
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Oral Research
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Six month follow-up of two Bulk-fill composites in non-carious cervical lesions: Double blind randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this