Erratum: The ALMA Frontier Fields Survey: IV. Lensing-corrected 1.1 mm number counts in Abell 2744, MACS J0416.1-2403, and MACS J1149.5+2223 (A&A (2018) 620 A125 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732442)

A. M. Muñoz Arancibia, J. González-López, E. Ibar, F. E. Bauer, M. Carrasco, N. Laporte, T. Anguita, M. Aravena, F. Barrientos, R. J. Bouwens, R. Demarco, L. Infante, R. Kneissl, N. Nagar, N. Padilla, C. Romero-Cañizales, P. Troncoso, A. Zitrin

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

We noticed an error in the code that conducts the source injection simulations used in our article Muñoz Arancibia et al. (2018). This error led the source scale radii in the image plane to be 1=2:35 times smaller that what it should be. Wrongly computed scale radii primarily a ect the calculation of first, completeness as a function of image-plane integrated flux density curves for di erent image-plane scale radii; and second, image-plane integrated flux densities estimated for low-significance ALMA detections. These in turn a ect the calculation of deboosting correction factors, demagnified integrated flux densities (for low-significance ALMA detections), di erential and cumulative number counts, and the contribution to the extragalactic background light.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberC2
JournalAstronomy and Astrophysics
Volume631
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: The ALMA Frontier Fields Survey: IV. Lensing-corrected 1.1 mm number counts in Abell 2744, MACS J0416.1-2403, and MACS J1149.5+2223 (A&A (2018) 620 A125 DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732442)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this