Effectiveness of interventions for dementia in low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analysis

Maximilian Salcher-Konrad, Huseyin Naci, David Mcdaid, Suvarna Alladi, Deborah Oliveira, Andra Fry, Shereen Hussein, Martin Knapp, Christine Wayua Musyimi, David Musyimi Ndetei, Mariana Lopez-Ortega, Adelina Comas-Herrera

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction There are more people living with dementia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) than in high-income countries. Evidence-based interventions to improve the lives of people living with dementia and their carers are needed, but a systematic mapping of methodologically robust studies in LMICs and synthesis of the effectiveness of dementia interventions in these settings is missing. Methods and analysis A systematic review and meta-analysis will be conducted to answer the question: Which dementia interventions were shown to be effective in LMICs and how do they compare to each other? Electronic database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Global Health, WHO Global Index Medicus, Virtual Health Library, Cochrane CENTRAL, Social Care Online, BASE, MODEM Toolkit, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) will be complemented by hand searching of reference lists and local knowledge of existing studies from an international network of researchers in dementia from LMICs. Studies will be eligible for inclusion if they were published between 2008 and 2018, conducted in LMICs and evaluated the effectiveness of a dementia intervention using a study design that supports causal inference of the treatment effect. We will include both randomised and non-randomised studies due to an anticipated low number of well-conducted randomised trials in LMICs and potentially greater external validity of non-randomised studies conducted in routine care settings. In addition to narrative synthesis of the interventions, feasibility of pairwise and network meta-analyses will be explored to obtain pooled effects of relative treatment effects. Ethics and dissemination Secondary analysis of published studies, therefore no ethics approval required. Planned dissemination channels include a peer-reviewed publication as well as a website, DVD and evidence summaries. Prospero registration number CRD42018106206.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere027851
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Alzheimer disease
  • dementia
  • developing countries
  • lamics
  • low and middle income countries
  • systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of interventions for dementia in low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this