TY - JOUR
T1 - Does refurbishing composites lead to short-term effects or long-lasting improvement?
AU - Godoy, Eduardo Fernández
AU - Grez, Patricio Vildósola
AU - Miranda, Cristian Bersezio
AU - Gordan, Valeria V.
AU - Mjör, Ivar A.
AU - Oliveira, Osmir Batista
AU - Pardo, Claudia Letelier
AU - Larenas, Juan Estay
AU - Cortés, Gustavo Moncada
AU - Casielles, Javier Martin
PY - 2015/8/1
Y1 - 2015/8/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of refurbished resin composite restorations compared to untreated (negative control) restorations over a period of 10 years. Methods: 26 subjects (having a total of 52 composite restorations) were recruited. All restorations in the refurbished group showed clinical features rated bravo according to modified USPHS criteria. Untreated restorations were those that had been deemed acceptable (alpha or bravo rated); these were used as controls. Two examiners performed assessments at baseline and during the 5th and 10th years after the intervention. Wilcoxon tests were performed for within-group comparisons, Friedman tests were used for multiple within-group comparisons, and Mann Whitney tests were used for between-groups comparisons. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated, and the Mantel-Cox test was used to compare curves. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In both groups, 10-year scores were significantly different from baseline scores in all clinical parameters except secondary caries. There were no statistically significant differences in the survival analysis of groups (log-rank test, P= 0.376). Refurbishing treatment improved the anatomy, roughness, luster, and marginal adaptation of restorations with a short term effect, with most properties rated acceptable after 10 years of clinical service. The clinical characteristics were similar for all groups at the 10th year.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of refurbished resin composite restorations compared to untreated (negative control) restorations over a period of 10 years. Methods: 26 subjects (having a total of 52 composite restorations) were recruited. All restorations in the refurbished group showed clinical features rated bravo according to modified USPHS criteria. Untreated restorations were those that had been deemed acceptable (alpha or bravo rated); these were used as controls. Two examiners performed assessments at baseline and during the 5th and 10th years after the intervention. Wilcoxon tests were performed for within-group comparisons, Friedman tests were used for multiple within-group comparisons, and Mann Whitney tests were used for between-groups comparisons. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated, and the Mantel-Cox test was used to compare curves. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In both groups, 10-year scores were significantly different from baseline scores in all clinical parameters except secondary caries. There were no statistically significant differences in the survival analysis of groups (log-rank test, P= 0.376). Refurbishing treatment improved the anatomy, roughness, luster, and marginal adaptation of restorations with a short term effect, with most properties rated acceptable after 10 years of clinical service. The clinical characteristics were similar for all groups at the 10th year.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942246194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 26437500
AN - SCOPUS:84942246194
SN - 0894-8275
VL - 28
SP - 203
EP - 208
JO - American Journal of Dentistry
JF - American Journal of Dentistry
IS - 4
ER -