DOCENCIA EN EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR: CRITERIOS Y ESTÁNDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE

Alejandro Pérez Carvajal; Juan Pablo  Catalán Cueto

doi:10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850

DOCENCIA EN EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR: CRITERIOS Y ESTÁNDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE

Translated title of the contribution: TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: CRITERIA AND STANDARDS OF QUALITY IN CHILE

Alejandro Pérez Carvajal, Juan Pablo Catalán Cueto

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article reveals the criteria and quality standards for the institutional accreditation of the university subsystem, Law 21,091. It asks: How is the dimension of teaching and the training process understood from the criteria and quality standards for institutional accreditation? The objective is to analyze the characteristics that are manifested explicitly and implicitly on this dimension. The methodology is a documentary study from direct and indirect sources. The conclusions express the need to disaggregate the elements concerning criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Teaching Dimension and Results of the Training Process.

Translated title of the contribution	TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: CRITERIA AND STANDARDS OF QUALITY IN CHILE
Original language	Spanish
Journal	Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades
Volume	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850
Publication status	Published - 2 Dec 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Arts and Humanities

Access to Document

10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850

Cite this

@article{9109f246507345bfadce4fe95fc65043,

title = "DOCENCIA EN EDUCACI{\'O}N SUPERIOR: CRITERIOS Y EST{\'A}NDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE",

abstract = "This article reveals the criteria and quality standards for the institutional accreditation of the university subsystem, Law 21,091. It asks: How is the dimension of teaching and the training process understood from the criteria and quality standards for institutional accreditation? The objective is to analyze the characteristics that are manifested explicitly and implicitly on this dimension. The methodology is a documentary study from direct and indirect sources. The conclusions express the need to disaggregate the elements concerning criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Teaching Dimension and Results of the Training Process.",

keywords = "Accreditation, Criteria and Standards, Higher education, Quality, Quality assurance, Teaching, University",

author = "Carvajal, {Alejandro P{\'e}rez} and {Catal{\'a}n Cueto}, {Juan Pablo}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} GKA Ediciones, authors.",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

day = "2",

doi = "10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850",

language = "Espa{\~n}ol",

volume = "11",

journal = "Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades",

issn = "2695-9623",

publisher = "Eagora Science",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - DOCENCIA EN EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR

T2 - CRITERIOS Y ESTÁNDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE

AU - Carvajal, Alejandro Pérez

AU - Catalán Cueto, Juan Pablo

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © GKA Ediciones, authors.

PY - 2022/12/2

Y1 - 2022/12/2

N2 - This article reveals the criteria and quality standards for the institutional accreditation of the university subsystem, Law 21,091. It asks: How is the dimension of teaching and the training process understood from the criteria and quality standards for institutional accreditation? The objective is to analyze the characteristics that are manifested explicitly and implicitly on this dimension. The methodology is a documentary study from direct and indirect sources. The conclusions express the need to disaggregate the elements concerning criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Teaching Dimension and Results of the Training Process.

AB - This article reveals the criteria and quality standards for the institutional accreditation of the university subsystem, Law 21,091. It asks: How is the dimension of teaching and the training process understood from the criteria and quality standards for institutional accreditation? The objective is to analyze the characteristics that are manifested explicitly and implicitly on this dimension. The methodology is a documentary study from direct and indirect sources. The conclusions express the need to disaggregate the elements concerning criteria 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Teaching Dimension and Results of the Training Process.

KW - Accreditation

KW - Criteria and Standards

KW - Higher education

KW - Quality

KW - Quality assurance

KW - Teaching

KW - University

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143673545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850

DO - 10.37467/revhuman.v11.3850

M3 - Artículo

AN - SCOPUS:85143673545

SN - 2695-9623

VL - 11

JO - Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

JF - Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades

ER -

DOCENCIA EN EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR: CRITERIOS Y ESTÁNDARES DE CALIDAD EN CHILE

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this