Abstract
Some disagreements seem to be persistent: they are, pretty much, immune to persuasive argumentation. If that is the case, how can they be overcome? Can argumentation help us? I propose that to overcome persis-tent disagreements through argumen-tation, we need a dynamic and plural-istic version of argumentation. There-fore, I propose that argumentation, more than a tool that uses persuasion to change the mind of the counterpart, is a toolbox that contains persuasion, deliberation, negotiation, and other dialogical strategies that can be used to reach an agreement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 245-280 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | Informal Logic |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- deliberation
- dialogue types
- negotiation
- persistent disagreement
- persuasion
- settlement
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy