Abstract
Some disagreements seem to be persistent: they are, pretty much, immune to persuasive argumentation. If that is the case, how can they be overcome? Can argumentation help us? I propose that to overcome persis-tent disagreements through argumen-tation, we need a dynamic and plural-istic version of argumentation. There-fore, I propose that argumentation, more than a tool that uses persuasion to change the mind of the counterpart, is a toolbox that contains persuasion, deliberation, negotiation, and other dialogical strategies that can be used to reach an agreement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 245-280 |
Number of pages | 36 |
Journal | Informal Logic |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- deliberation
- dialogue types
- negotiation
- persistent disagreement
- persuasion
- settlement
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy