TY - JOUR
T1 - A New Reliable Device to Assess Trunk Extensors Strength
AU - Reyes-Ferrada, Waleska
AU - Chirosa-Ríos, Luis
AU - Chirosa-Ríos, Ignacio
AU - Martínez-García, Darío
AU - Barboza-Gonzalez, Paola
AU - Ulloa-Díaz, David
AU - Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel
AU - Rodríguez-Perea, Ángela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Institute of Machine Design and Operation. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: This study aims to examine the reliability of trunk extensor strength assessment with a functional electromechanical dynamometer (FEMD). Methods: Thirty-one men performed strength assessment at different velocities (V) (V1=0.15 m·s−1, V2=0.30 m·s−1, V3=0.45 m·s−1) and range of movement (R) (R1=25% cm; R2=50% cm), and isometric contraction at 90º. Reliability was obtained through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), typical error (TE), and coefficient of variation (CV). Results: The absolute reliability provided stable repeatability of the average eccentric strength in the V1R1 condition (CV=9.52%) and the maximum eccentric strength in V1R1 (CV=9.63%) and V2R2 (CV=9.66%). The relative reliability of the trunk extensor's average strength was good (ICC=0.77-0.83) for concentric and good (ICC=0.78-0.85) and moderate (ICC=0.67-0.74) for eccentric contraction. Also, good (ICC=0.77-0.81) and moderate (ICC=0.55-0.74) reliability of the maximum strength were obtained for concentric and eccentric contraction. The most reliable manifestation to evaluate the concentric (CV=11.33%) and eccentric (CV=9.52%) strength was the average strength in the V1R1 condition and the maximum strength (CV=10.29%) to isometric assessment. The average concentric strength in the V2R2 condition (r=0.69) and the maximum eccentric strength in the V1R1 condition (r=0.65) were the best related to the maximum isometric strength. Conclusion: FEMD is a highly reliable device to evaluate trunk extensors strength.
AB - Purpose: This study aims to examine the reliability of trunk extensor strength assessment with a functional electromechanical dynamometer (FEMD). Methods: Thirty-one men performed strength assessment at different velocities (V) (V1=0.15 m·s−1, V2=0.30 m·s−1, V3=0.45 m·s−1) and range of movement (R) (R1=25% cm; R2=50% cm), and isometric contraction at 90º. Reliability was obtained through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), typical error (TE), and coefficient of variation (CV). Results: The absolute reliability provided stable repeatability of the average eccentric strength in the V1R1 condition (CV=9.52%) and the maximum eccentric strength in V1R1 (CV=9.63%) and V2R2 (CV=9.66%). The relative reliability of the trunk extensor's average strength was good (ICC=0.77-0.83) for concentric and good (ICC=0.78-0.85) and moderate (ICC=0.67-0.74) for eccentric contraction. Also, good (ICC=0.77-0.81) and moderate (ICC=0.55-0.74) reliability of the maximum strength were obtained for concentric and eccentric contraction. The most reliable manifestation to evaluate the concentric (CV=11.33%) and eccentric (CV=9.52%) strength was the average strength in the V1R1 condition and the maximum strength (CV=10.29%) to isometric assessment. The average concentric strength in the V2R2 condition (r=0.69) and the maximum eccentric strength in the V1R1 condition (r=0.65) were the best related to the maximum isometric strength. Conclusion: FEMD is a highly reliable device to evaluate trunk extensors strength.
KW - core
KW - dynamometer
KW - isokinetic
KW - reproducibility
KW - strength
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135567189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.37190/ABB-01965-2021-05
DO - 10.37190/ABB-01965-2021-05
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135567189
SN - 1509-409X
VL - 24
JO - Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
JF - Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
IS - 1
ER -